CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

2020-02-27T13:50:45.791000Z

Hi Nate,
ok the if need 64Bit Windows-> PLCWinNt is the only option you have.
BR
Edwin

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

2020-02-27T13:50:45.658000Z

Hello Edwin,

Actually, the effort to upgrade to V3 would be an incredible challenge. It's difficult to explain, but my application is very special and I am working with a CoDeSys 2.3 project that is generated from an automated tool with 1,000's of function blocks and libraries used from other sources. Additionally, my company already has 1,000's of stations running V2.3, I'm just trying to get away from the legacy hardware (Windows XP based system).

If I'm limited to WinNT PLC, I think it's not a problem so long as the only limitation is real time control.

Thanks,
-Nate

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

2020-02-27T13:50:45.517000Z

Hi,

I would give Control RTE (V3) a try.
If you need help on the import process, send the project to e support@codesys.com e
at least some screenshots which libraries are used in your project would help to give a more detailed statement
how many effort you have to expect on upating to CODESYS V3.
BR
Edwin

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

2020-02-27T13:50:45.390000Z

Hello Edwin,

The directory you supplied says CoDeSys SP RTE3, I'm working with v2.3, would that driver still work? Otherwise, I guess I'm stuck with the PLCWinNT target?

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

2020-02-27T13:50:45.246000Z

Hi Nate,
no nothing else... use CmpEt1000MPD ("c:\Program Files\3S CoDeSys\CODESYS Control RTE3\CmpEt1000MPD\net541ex.inf" ) for I210 Adapater in Windows DeviceManager
and add the Component to the RTE configuration.

BR
Edwin

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

2020-02-27T13:50:45.114000Z

Hi Edwin,

That's very interesting because I've already changed to Control Win and it relieved the problem (got another error now, but there definitely is a network connection, should be resolved in the next few minutes).

But I would prefer to use the RTE. Is there anything else I should modify then for RTE to support my network adapter?

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

2020-02-27T13:50:44.610000Z

Hi,

wow.. no our FAQ info seems to be outdated, this is meanwhile supported on Control RTE to use I210.
Not needed to change to Control Win.

BR
Edwin

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

2020-02-27T13:50:44.456000Z

I think I have come to realize that my network adapters may not be supported by CoDeSyS RTE. I have only the "Intel I210 Gigabit" adapters on this PC. But I have also read from this post (Edwin, I'm looking at your post below):

l viewtopic.php?f=4&t=5711&p=10291&hilit=rte+network#p10291 l

That the Win PLC can support any adapter. I will make tests with Win PLC to see if it helps.

Thanks everyone, let me know if this sounds correct.

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

2020-02-27T13:50:44.301000Z

That's awesome, thanks for all the help guys. We'll see how it goes when I try to roll it all out, maybe when I get adventurous down the road I'll try and make the jumpt to CoDeSyS v3.

Thanks,
-Nate

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

2020-02-27T13:50:44.138000Z

Hi Nate,

Just one final question I have not been able to confirm, can the CoDeSyS 2.3.9.47 RTE run on Win7 32-bit?
yes for sure.

BR
Edwin Schwellinger
3S - Smart Software Solutions GmbH

Recent posts to CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application

CoDeSyS 2.3 vs 3.5 RTE for my application