<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent posts to Profinet IO over Wifi extender.</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/17d0538e23/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/17d0538e23/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/17d0538e23/</id><updated>2022-12-15T10:34:24.693000Z</updated><subtitle>Recent posts to Profinet IO over Wifi extender.</subtitle><entry><title>Profinet IO over Wifi extender.</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/17d0538e23/?limit=25#30b0" rel="alternate"/><published>2022-12-15T10:34:24.693000Z</published><updated>2022-12-15T10:34:24.693000Z</updated><author><name>jayd</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jayd/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com4e4480ca6df39c3c27faf2f82965a2d23e62f59e</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I've been in contanct with a Teltonika technician that remotely connected to ensure that the configuration of the Rut240's were properly set for this specific usecase. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If their routers doesn't support Profinet, it seems silly that they didn't point it out before we spent many hours online, trying to make it work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'll be asking them later today and if this is true, I'll move to look at the Phoenix Contacts to find an alternative. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many thanks for the reply.&lt;br/&gt;
Have a nice day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Profinet IO over Wifi extender.</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/17d0538e23/?limit=250#d138" rel="alternate"/><published>2022-12-14T16:51:07.639000Z</published><updated>2022-12-14T16:51:07.639000Z</updated><author><name>h-hermsen</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/hermsen/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com33904fb71803e6fe25cee64a2b90bb1e51bbfb89</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you call / mail with Teltonika support, you would have found out that what you are doing is not supported and therefore probably will not work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please check this with your reseller, mine told: NO not supported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With regards,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Profinet IO over Wifi extender.</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/17d0538e23/?limit=25#07ad" rel="alternate"/><published>2022-12-14T07:55:42.547000Z</published><updated>2022-12-14T07:55:42.547000Z</updated><author><name>jayd</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jayd/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com6e333866dcfcab1428baf92a2bedaa93b3689043</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm trying to make a Profinet coupler work with an Exor PLC over a Wifi Network.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have 2 Teltonika RUT240 modems where the Coupler is connected to the first RUT240, which in turn is connected to the other RUT240 wirelessly that have the plc connected. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I'm using this configuration of network I get an "DCP No RealStationName" error (error.png).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The wierd thing is if I take the plc and coupler and just simply connected to the same switch, with no settings changed, I don't get the DCP error and it works as intended.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyone who have an idea what might be happening with the DCP error? I personally very rarely work with Profinet so any help/idead would be much appreciated! &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>