<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent posts to Did redundancy change in 3.5.18?</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/a6104c5c5e/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/a6104c5c5e/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/a6104c5c5e/</id><updated>2022-11-07T15:58:14.764000Z</updated><subtitle>Recent posts to Did redundancy change in 3.5.18?</subtitle><entry><title>Did redundancy change in 3.5.18?</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/a6104c5c5e/?limit=25#0913" rel="alternate"/><published>2022-11-07T15:58:14.764000Z</published><updated>2022-11-07T15:58:14.764000Z</updated><author><name>Ulvis</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/ulvis/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com42554453fdf6d8b1b988b44d7fe5c2f165be5bd0</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Do you feel the call to investigate?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Did redundancy change in 3.5.18?</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/a6104c5c5e/?limit=25#a369" rel="alternate"/><published>2022-11-02T18:07:57.123000Z</published><updated>2022-11-02T18:07:57.123000Z</updated><author><name>eschwellinger</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/eschwellinger/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com61a17071f36f8c741dd02b3dfc157cf42999d360</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;..should be reproduced/investigated&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Did redundancy change in 3.5.18?</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/a6104c5c5e/?limit=25#2c69" rel="alternate"/><published>2022-11-02T17:17:28.946000Z</published><updated>2022-11-02T17:17:28.946000Z</updated><author><name>Ulvis</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/ulvis/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com1b239f154fd2517ab859f7cc3dfe897816a70127</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class="user-mention" href="/u/eschwellinger/"&gt;@eschwellinger&lt;/a&gt; ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Did redundancy change in 3.5.18?</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/a6104c5c5e/?limit=25#2d01" rel="alternate"/><published>2022-11-01T15:41:10.746000Z</published><updated>2022-11-01T15:41:10.746000Z</updated><author><name>Ulvis</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/ulvis/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.coma51fef2042066658020135c7fa2914f0467a68ec</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unlike "before", now if PLC1 is "active" and PLC2 is "passive", then if PLC2 is rebooted - it will first sync with the live PLC1, but ultimately IT WILL AQUIRE ACTIVE STATE!!! Why does PLC2 not go to passive and leave the "active" PLC1 beeing undisturbed??&lt;br/&gt;
Beats me.... is this by design?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>