Welcome to our new forum
All users of the legacy CODESYS Forums, please create a new account at account.codesys.com. But make sure to use the same E-Mail address as in the old Forum. Then your posts will be matched.
Close
Hello,
we are quite new to CodeSys 3.5, while we are quite experienced with CodeSys 2.
In CodeSys 2 for managing incoming TCP connections we used the 'SysLibSocket.lib' library, that seems that it been ported in CodeSys 3.5 as 'SysSocket23'.
The fact is that we noticed a strange behavior of the new Librarys w.r.t. the following call:
In CodeSys 2, with 'SysLibSocket.lib', m_BytesReceived is valued to 0 when the socket is closed by the client, -1 only if the socket is active and no characters have been sent by the client.
In CodeSys 3, with 'SysSocket23' we noticed that m_BytesReceived is -1 in both cases: if the socket is active and no data have been sent, but also if the socket has been closed by the client.
How can we detect if the client has closed the socket with CodeSys 3 and 'SysSocket23'?
Many thanks,
Diego
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Hello,
we are quite new to CodeSys 3.5, while we are quite experienced with CodeSys 2.
In CodeSys 2 for managing incoming TCP connections we used the 'SysLibSocket.lib' library, that seems that it been ported in CodeSys 3.5 as 'SysSocket23'.
The fact is that we noticed a strange behavior of the new Librarys w.r.t. the following call:
m_BytesReceived:= SysSockRecv( m_Socket, ADR(m_ReceiveBuffer), SIZEOF(m_ReceiveBuffer), 0);
In CodeSys 2, with 'SysLibSocket.lib', m_BytesReceived is valued to 0 when the socket is closed by the client, -1 only if the socket is active and no characters have been sent by the client.
In CodeSys 3, with 'SysSocket23' we noticed that m_BytesReceived is -1 in both cases: if the socket is active and no data have been sent, but also if the socket has been closed by the client.
How can we detect if the client has closed the socket with CodeSys 3 and 'SysSocket23'?
Many thanks,
Diego