<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Activity for drugilue</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/u/drugilue/activity/" rel="alternate"/><id>https://forge.codesys.com/u/drugilue/activity/</id><updated>2021-03-15T17:09:49.971000Z</updated><subtitle>Recent activity for drugilue</subtitle><entry><title>drugilue posted a comment on discussion Engineering 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/fa0a40fbac/?limit=25#76ee" rel="alternate"/><published>2021-03-15T17:09:49.971000Z</published><updated>2021-03-15T17:09:49.971000Z</updated><author><name>drugilue</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/drugilue/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/fa0a40fbac/?limit=25#76ee</id><summary type="html">Hi....i suggest Ethercat - &gt; 24 V PoE injector - &gt; Esmacat(EASE) - &gt; Arduino - &gt; LED. It sounds to me like optocouplers and PoE have a comparable capacity in the arrangement as the PoE injector, yet they notice that the injector is on the grounds that EASE is fueled through 24 V Poe and Beckhoff gadgets may not be. I thought the explanation behind an optocoupler was to decrease the voltage from 24 V emerging from the KRC4 minimal to 5 V for the Arduino.</summary></entry></feed>