<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Activity for jonasz</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/activity/" rel="alternate"/><id>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/activity/</id><updated>2025-11-21T19:32:26.978000Z</updated><subtitle>Recent activity for jonasz</subtitle><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Runtime 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#187a" rel="alternate"/><published>2025-11-21T19:32:26.978000Z</published><updated>2025-11-21T19:32:26.978000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#187a</id><summary type="html">Thank you for your response. Is there documentation for the commands? I spent a lot of time trying to figure this out. I have a potato computer at home, so I'll have to test this later.</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Runtime 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#a36e" rel="alternate"/><published>2025-11-19T08:00:59.001000Z</published><updated>2025-11-19T08:00:59.001000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#a36e</id><summary type="html">Good morning, I'm digging into this topic because I'm curious about resolving my problem in a test environment. In my previous message, I asked about the CODESYS Safe Timeprovider SL package (4.18.0.0), which I saw in the illustration. I noticed that it runs as a service. I am asking about this because from the perspective of an "ordinary" user, this service provides easier access to the settings of the time provider's operating parameters. The basic time provider configuration is outlined at https://content.helpme-codesys.com/en/CODESYS%20Control/_rtsl_virtual_safe_time_provider.html....</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Runtime 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#9cd8" rel="alternate"/><published>2025-11-18T21:24:03.857000Z</published><updated>2025-11-18T21:24:03.857000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#9cd8</id><summary type="html">Thank you for the information and support - I need to think this through again.</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Runtime 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#e542" rel="alternate"/><published>2025-11-18T10:51:28.046000Z</published><updated>2025-11-18T10:51:28.046000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#e542</id><summary type="html">Hello, Basically, everything is clear to me. There's still the issue of a TimeProvider for an external device. This may be a stupid question, but I can't find this package. And of course, the question is, can the RPi machine be an external provider? Has anyone tested such a solution?</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Runtime 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#a169" rel="alternate"/><published>2025-11-17T18:31:14.754000Z</published><updated>2025-11-17T18:31:14.754000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#a169</id><summary type="html">The machine I'm currently using (Celeron J1900) already has the Kernel RT patch. I checked the performance according to the documentation. After running CyclicTest for 4 cores, the value for each core is around 6-7. I went through the entire process according to the documentation (I envy the TaskMonitor results in the documentation). The documentation states: "CODESYS Virtual Safe Time Provider The CODESYS Virtual Safe Time Provider is a standard interface that the user can use to transfer a second...</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Runtime 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#ddf7" rel="alternate"/><published>2025-11-17T13:22:02.376000Z</published><updated>2025-11-17T13:22:02.376000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#ddf7</id><summary type="html">After carefully studying the documentation, I have a question: is a second hardware-independent time source required for the correct operation of the VirtualSafety system?</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Runtime 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#2738" rel="alternate"/><published>2025-11-14T13:46:58.456000Z</published><updated>2025-11-14T13:46:58.456000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#2738</id><summary type="html">So here's how: I manually installed the following packages: codemeter-lite_8.30.6885.501_amd64.deb codesyslicenseserver_licenseserver_4.18.0.0_all.deb codesyswbmbase_wbmbase_4.18.0.0_all.deb codesyswbmlicensing_wbmlicensing_4.18.0.0_all.deb Of course, the license server appeared immediately. Trying to install it again using Install in the Deploy tab, the same error appears. Of course, the information that such a server is already installed is also there. Configuring PLC, S_PLC, EDGE, and SAFE_TIMER_PROVIDER...</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Runtime 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#8757" rel="alternate"/><published>2025-11-14T09:57:29.342000Z</published><updated>2025-11-14T09:57:29.342000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Runtime/thread/1ecae2125a/?limit=25#8757</id><summary type="html">Hello, I'm asking for help with installing the license server for Linux SL 4.18.0.0. When I try to install it, I get a message that the WIBUCodeMeter package is missing. I checked the package manager tab to see if the package is installed, and it is - Codemeter 8.40.7120.501. I've checked the CodeMeter Runtime on the target machine, and everything seems to be working fine. One thing caught my eye: the Device Architecture tab says "None" Please help me solve this problem.</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Visualization 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Visualization/thread/115f8445cb/?limit=25#6284" rel="alternate"/><published>2025-08-21T06:56:00.607000Z</published><updated>2025-08-21T06:56:00.607000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Visualization/thread/115f8445cb/?limit=25#6284</id><summary type="html">This solution did not give me peace of mind, so I decided to check other options again, especially since artifacts appear on some controls in WebVis. The solution is to enable the Multitouch handling option in the additional settings tab.</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Visualization 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Visualization/thread/115f8445cb/?limit=25#79cd" rel="alternate"/><published>2025-08-19T11:29:49.870000Z</published><updated>2025-08-19T11:29:49.870000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Visualization/thread/115f8445cb/?limit=25#79cd</id><summary type="html">So, in my case, the solution is to uncheck the option to support client animation and overlay native elements. Visualisation Manager -&gt; Settings -&gt; General Settings</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Visualization 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Visualization/thread/115f8445cb/?limit=25#f59a" rel="alternate"/><published>2025-08-19T10:44:05.477000Z</published><updated>2025-08-19T10:44:05.477000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Visualization/thread/115f8445cb/?limit=25#f59a</id><summary type="html">Hi, Did you find a solution to the problem?</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Engineering 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/d2ebf46a01/?limit=25#54fa" rel="alternate"/><published>2025-07-15T10:12:26.494000Z</published><updated>2025-07-15T10:12:26.494000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Engineering/thread/d2ebf46a01/?limit=25#54fa</id><summary type="html">Hi, I'll link to the topic not wanting to start a new one. In the application I am building, I wanted to use the diagnostics described in the CAA Device Diagnosis library. In principle, everything is ok, except for the elements related to ModbusTCP. Despite the fact that ModbusTCP is taken into account in the documentation, it is not recognised via the interfaces. FUNCTION_BLOCK NET_HW_DIAG VAR_INPUT END_VAR VAR_OUTPUT END_VAR VAR (* Referencja do struktury z danymi dla HMI ASTRAADA.*) Visu: REFERENCE...</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Motion 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Motion/thread/5c283672f3/?limit=25#e1d5" rel="alternate"/><published>2024-05-09T20:30:04.856000Z</published><updated>2024-05-09T20:30:04.856000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Motion/thread/5c283672f3/?limit=25#e1d5</id><summary type="html">PrtScr</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Motion 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Motion/thread/5c283672f3/?limit=25#271f" rel="alternate"/><published>2024-05-09T20:23:03.551000Z</published><updated>2024-05-09T20:23:03.551000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Motion/thread/5c283672f3/?limit=25#271f</id><summary type="html">Hi, My problem was related to the behavior of the modulo axis, but maybe you will find something useful from what I write. The solution lies in path processing. Codesys offers a G-code analysis tool. Insert a CNC object into the project. The CNC settings object will be added automatically. By inserting appropriate processing modules into the CNC settings object and parameterizing them, you can test the behavior of the axis. When the effect is satisfactory, remember to add the module from CNC settings...</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz modified a comment on ticket #173</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/support/173/?limit=25#17cd" rel="alternate"/><published>2024-04-04T12:29:43.796000Z</published><updated>2024-04-04T12:29:43.796000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/support/173/?limit=25#17cd</id><summary type="html">Finally I switched to "simulation mode" and of course everything works here. I assume that "Soft-PLC" does not support visualization, hence the problem. To tell you the truth, I use operator panels for visualization, and if it weren't for the need to test a few things, I wouldn't pay attention to it. Perhaps I missed this change during one of the updates, or there was some possibility of bypassing the license and using "Soft-PLC" as a full-fledged solution and it was removed.</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on ticket #173</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/support/173/?limit=25#17cd" rel="alternate"/><published>2024-04-04T12:29:15.437000Z</published><updated>2024-04-04T12:29:15.437000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/support/173/?limit=25#17cd</id><summary type="html">Eventually I switched to "simulation mode" and of course everything works here. I assume that "Soft-PLC" does not support visualization, hence the problem. To tell you the truth, I use operator panels for visualization, and if it weren't for the need to test a few things, I wouldn't pay attention to it. Perhaps I missed this change during one of the updates, or there was some possibility of bypassing the license and using "Soft-PLC" as a full-fledged solution and it was removed.</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on ticket #173</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/support/173/?limit=25#5e22" rel="alternate"/><published>2024-04-04T11:40:26.880000Z</published><updated>2024-04-04T11:40:26.880000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/support/173/?limit=25#5e22</id><summary type="html">Hi, is there any solution to the problem? You can find the missing file in the C:\Program Files (x86)\CODESYS 3.5.19.60\GatewayPLC\tempCFG directory, but attaching it to the c:\ProgramData\CODESYS\CODESYSControlWinV3\&lt;unique number=""&gt;\ directory does not solve the problem with visualization.&lt;/unique&gt; In the log file you can find the entry: 04/04/24 13:32:44: --------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- 04/04/24 13:32:44: CODESYS Control Win V3 Service started 04/04/24...</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Motion 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Motion/thread/5c283672f3/?limit=25#7101" rel="alternate"/><published>2023-04-25T05:49:23.887000Z</published><updated>2023-04-25T05:49:23.887000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Motion/thread/5c283672f3/?limit=25#7101</id><summary type="html">Good morning, I solved the problem. I was hoping for support, unfortunately.</summary></entry><entry><title>jonasz posted a comment on discussion Motion 🇬🇧</title><link href="https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Motion/thread/5c283672f3/?limit=25#2a08" rel="alternate"/><published>2023-04-16T12:28:02.680000Z</published><updated>2023-04-16T12:28:02.680000Z</updated><author><name>jonasz</name><uri>https://forge.codesys.com/u/jonasz/profile/</uri></author><id>https://forge.codesys.com/forge/talk/Motion/thread/5c283672f3/?limit=25#2a08</id><summary type="html">Good day , I was given the task of making a 6-axis CNC machine (X/Y/Z/A/B/C). The machine is a coil winder, where the A/B/C axes are the axes that rotate the spindles, and the Z axis is the axis that moves the wire from one extreme position of the coil to the other. The problem is the discontinuity of A/B/C axis movement (velocity profile). In the path preprocessing step, I am not able to get continuous ABC axis movement. Here is the test G-code: N000 G91 N010 G01 Z10 A360 F100 E1000 E-1000 FA100...</summary></entry></feed>