Post by mucleus on How do I fix ";Internal Error (x86-64): Invalid type size" error?
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Post)
I opened the project file of version 3.5.19.7 in 3.5.21.0. I updated all the environment of the project to the latest and compiled it. When I compile it, I get an error ";Internal Error (x86-64): Invalid type size". How can I fix this error? I will wait for your help.
Last updated: 2025-04-15
Post by rossanoparis on Internal Error (ARM): Unsupported conversion! With new version v3.5 SP21
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Post)
I have updated CODESYS development tool to the version v3.5 SP21 (64bit) The previous version was v3.5.20.40 Compiling an existing application with the new evelopment tool I get the following error. kunbusiodrvrevpibridge, 1.4.1.0 (kunbus gmbh): IoDrvScanModules [IoDrvRevPiBridge](Line 51, Column 1 (Impl)): Internal Error (ARM): Unsupported conversion! This error was not reported in the previous compiler version and is now highlighted in a third-party library, which I cannot change or modify. The error is due to the following conversion: m_udiError := TO_UDINT(excCode); . The excCode variable is a system type, declared as shown below, and should be converted to a UDINT excCode : __SYSTEM.ExceptionCode; m_udiError: UDINT; . I would appreciate it if someone could provide feedback on this issue.
Last updated: 2025-04-15
Post by respl on Anyone Ever use CAN with Kollmorgen S600 Drive
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Post)
Dear eschwellinger, Can you please share which library to use. Also if possible please share backup it really help us. On Codesys Store there are many ( CoDeSys Softmotion) option available. Please guide me to choose right product which has driver for servostar 600 as mention above. Regards, Rahul Sayre service.retrofilm@gmail.com +91-9607140005
Last updated: 2025-04-15
Anyone Ever use CAN with Kollmorgen S600 Drive
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Thread)
Anyone Ever use CAN with Kollmorgen S600 Drive
Last updated: 2025-04-15
Post by snguyen on Atomic and Shared memory?
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Post)
Hi, I've read that you can perform Atomic instructions like AtomicReadLInt on variables. However, I'd like to know if this uses stdatomic internally. My main question is : Is it possible to share atomic types in shared memory with CodeSys. If so, what types should they be declared as? If not, are the atomic functions lock-free or does it use a mutex?
Last updated: 2025-04-15
Atomic and Shared memory?
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Thread)
Atomic and Shared memory?
Last updated: 2025-04-15
Internal Error (ARM): Unsupported conversion! With new version v3.5 SP21
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Thread)
Internal Error (ARM): Unsupported conversion! With new version v3.5 SP21
Last updated: 2025-04-15
Home (version 1) discussion
arihu
wiki
(Thread)
Home (version 1) discussion
Last updated: 2025-04-16
Post by reinier-geers on Statusabfrage EtherCAT Device
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Post)
Hallo, Kan man nur auf diese weise den status bekommen ? oder gibt es wie bei Can ein Stategetter ?
Last updated: 2025-04-16
Setpoints Delta robot
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Thread)
Setpoints Delta robot
Last updated: 2025-04-16
Post by jbu0105 on Setpoints Delta robot
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Post)
Hello, I am working on a delta robot. Now was i wondering if anyone knows whats the best way to program the different setpoints for the delta Robot. I would like to use the functions MC_MoveLinearAbsolute and the function MC_MoveCircularAbsolute with the transition on this function. Can anyone help me with al small setup?
Last updated: 2025-04-16
Post by jbu0105 on Setpoints Delta robot
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Post)
Hello, I am working on a delta robot. Now was i wondering if anyone knows whats the best way to program the different setpoints for the delta Robot. I would like to use the functions MC_MoveLinearAbsolute and the function MC_MoveCircularAbsolute with the transition on this function. Can anyone help me with al small setup?
Last updated: 2025-04-16
Setpoints Delta robot
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Thread)
Setpoints Delta robot
Last updated: 2025-04-16
Post by jampid on How do I fix ";Internal Error (x86-64): Invalid type size" error?
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Post)
Bonjour Mucleus, peut-être mettre à jour le Device et recompiler?
Last updated: 2025-04-16
How do I fix ";Internal Error (x86-64): Invalid type size" error?
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Thread)
How do I fix ";Internal Error (x86-64): Invalid type size" error?
Last updated: 2025-04-16
Home (version 1) discussion
jbu0105
wiki
(Thread)
Home (version 1) discussion
Last updated: 2025-04-17
Post by lookingforhelp on CODESYS v3.5 SP18
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Post)
I am so sorry this topic was posted twice and the subject is not completely. It should named like "CODESYS v3.5 SP18 - Missing Action".
Last updated: 2025-04-17
Post by lookingforhelp on CODESYS v3.5 SP18
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Post)
Hello @community, i hope i will get a solution for following problem. I am using CODESYS v3.5 SP18. At the visualization i dont see the action for the element which i could set below the InputConfiguration-Section. I found a topic about that, but this could be resolved through activate the Advanced Checkbox. But in my case it did not work. See the screenshots. I hope someone know this problem and have a solution. Thank you in advance.
Last updated: 2025-04-17
Post by lookingforhelp on CODESYS v3.5 SP18
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Post)
Hello @community, i hope i will get a solution for following problem. I am using CODESYS v3.5 SP18. At the visualization i dont see the action for the element which i could set below the InputConfiguration-Section. I found a topic about that, but this could be resolved through activate the Advanced Checkbox. But in my case it did not work. See the screenshots. I hope someone know this problem and have a solution. Thank you in advance.
Last updated: 2025-04-17
CODESYS v3.5 SP18
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Thread)
CODESYS v3.5 SP18
Last updated: 2025-04-17
Post by dkugler on Statusabfrage EtherCAT Device
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Post)
das könnte noch eine Möglichkeit sein, siehe Codesys Hilfe: https://content.helpme-codesys.com/en/libs/IODrvEtherCATDriver/Current/IoDrvEtherCAT.html#chained-list-for-checking-of-all-slaves
Last updated: 2025-04-17
Statusabfrage EtherCAT Device
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Thread)
Statusabfrage EtherCAT Device
Last updated: 2025-04-17
Post by lookingforhelp on CODESYS v3.5 SP18
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Post)
Thanks, but unfortunately it does not work. I tried also the other function in the Properties window. What i tried also is to change the Visu-Style or looking for options.
Last updated: 2025-04-17
Post by dkugler on CODESYS v3.5 SP18
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Post)
click at "Filter" left from advanced and activate "all categories"
Last updated: 2025-04-17
Post by bschraud on runtime received SIGABRT
CODESYS Forge
talk
(Post)
Ich konnte den Fehler leider nicht wirklich finden. Hier mein bisheriger Fortschritt: Um nähere Informationen zu bekommen, habe ich einen strace erstellt: PID ermitteln: $ ps aux | grep codesyscontrol | grep -v grep --> 560 sudo strace -tt -f -p 560 -o /tmp/codesys_strace.log (Die Logdatei wird schnell einige hundert MB groß.) Mit grep -B 100 'si_signo=SIGABRT' /tmp/codesys_strace.log konnte ich die relevanten Einträge finden: (Die PID hat sich inzwischen wegen einem Reboot geändert) 1023 15:33:49.497136 writev(2, [{iov_base="Unexpected error 9 on netlink de"..., iov_len=45}], 1 <unfinished ...=""> .. 1023 15:33:49.498352 tgkill(545, 1023, SIGABRT <unfinished ...=""> 1023 15:33:49.498440 <... tgkill resumed> ) = 0 .. 1023 15:33:49.498730 --- SIGABRT {si_signo=SIGABRT, si_code=SI_TKILL, si_pid=545, si_uid=0}</unfinished></unfinished> Der Codesys Log zeigt zu diesem Zeitpunkt: Exception: HANDLED EXCPT <excpt>NonContinuable</excpt> in CH_COMM_CYCLE Mit sudo lsof -p 545 habe ich die Anzahl der geöffneten Dateien überprüft ohne Auffälligkeiten Mit sudo netstat -tunaep | grep codesys habe ich die offenen Netzwerkverbindungen der codesys Prozesse überprüft Hier sieht es so aus, dass codesyscontrol und codesysedge über die externen Netzwerkschnittstelle anstatt über den localhost kommunizieren: udp 0 0 172.19.11.127:1740 0.0.0.0: 0 17882 549/codesyscontrol. udp 0 0 172.19.11.255:1740 0.0.0.0: 0 17883 549/codesyscontrol. udp 0 0 172.19.11.255:1743 0.0.0.0: 0 16993 529/codesysedge.bin udp 0 0 172.19.11.127:1743 0.0.0.0: 0 16992 529/codesysedge.bin Leider kann ich keine Konfiguration mit einer anderen Schnittstelle einstellen.. Als nächstes habe ich die udp Kommunikation der beiden Prozesse aufgezeichnet: SPID des BlkDrvUdp Threads ermitteln: $ ps aux | grep codesyscontrol | grep -v grep --> 548 $ ps -T -p 548 | grep BlkDrvUdp --> 1200 Damit kann man den strace starten: sudo strace -p 1020 -f -tt -o /tmp/udp_control_trace.log -e trace=socket,connect,bind,sendto,recvfrom,close $ ps aux | grep codesysedge | grep -v grep --> 528 $ ps -T -p 528 | grep BlkDrvUdp --> 789 sudo strace -p 789 -f -tt -o /tmp/udp_edge_trace.log -e trace=socket,connect,bind,sendto,recvfrom,close Beim Aufzeichnen des Traces kamen wiederholte Fehlereinträge im codesyscontrol.log (diesmal ohne SIGABRT) nach folgendem Muster: tail -f /var/opt/codesys/codesyscontrol.log (mit UTC Zeit) 2025-04-17T11:23:43.147Z, 0x00000071, 1, 0, 0, Host : PAC4 2025-04-17T11:23:43.147Z, 0x00000071, 1, 0, 0, HTTP port : 8080 2025-04-17T11:23:43.147Z, 0x00000071, 1, 0, 0, HTTPS port : 443 2025-04-17T11:23:43.147Z, 0x00000071, 1, 0, 0, Connection type : HTTP 2025-04-17T11:23:43.147Z, 0x00000071, 1, 0, 0, ********** 2025-04-17T11:23:46.318Z, 0x00000061, 1, 0, 0, Create asymmetric key done! 2025-04-17T11:23:53.464Z, 0x00000071, 1, 404, 0, File $PlcLogic$/$visu$/favicon.ico not found on this server 2025-04-17T11:23:55.208Z, 0x0000100c, 1, 0, 0, Visu_PRG: Creating Client for Extern-ID: 2025487823 2025-04-17T11:23:55.216Z, 0x0000100c, 1, 0, 0, Visu_PRG: Creating Client successful for Extern-ID: 2025487823 Returned IEC-ID: 0 2025-04-17T11:40:43.471Z, 0x00000114, 4, 1, 0, ** ERROR: SysTaskCreate [CheckLicense0]: pthread_setname_np: Bad file descriptor Hier der dazu passende trace auszug von grep -B 100 '13:40:43' /tmp/udp_edge_trace.log: 798 13:40:42.592535 socket(AF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW|SOCK_CLOEXEC, NETLINK_ROUTE) = 9 798 13:40:42.592794 bind(9, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK, nl_pid=0, nl_groups=00000000}, 12) = 0 798 13:40:42.593049 sendto(9, {{len=20, type=0x12 / NLMSG_??? /, flags=NLM_F_REQUEST|0x300, seq=1744890042, pid=0}, "\x00\x00\x00\x00"}, 20, 0, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK, nl_pid=0, nl_groups=00000000}, 12) = 20 798 13:40:42.602995 sendto(9, {{len=20, type=0x16 / NLMSG_??? /, flags=NLM_F_REQUEST|0x300, seq=1744890043, pid=0}, "\x00\x00\x00\x00"}, 20, 0, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK, nl_pid=0, nl_groups=00000000}, 12) = 20 798 13:40:42.614794 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.615065 socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 9 798 13:40:42.615331 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.616159 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.616318 socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 9 798 13:40:42.616555 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.617209 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.617355 socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 9 798 13:40:42.617590 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.618497 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.618712 socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 9 798 13:40:42.618995 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.619568 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.620247 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.620441 socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 9 798 13:40:42.620690 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.621181 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.621823 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:43.520036 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:43.520406 close(9) = 0 und grep -B 100 '13:40:43' /tmp/udp_control_trace.log 1035 13:40:43.389785 socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 20 1035 13:40:43.390043 close(20) = 0 1035 13:40:43.390681 close(20) = 0 1035 13:40:43.393690 close(20) = 0 22586 13:40:43.450945 close(0) = 0 22586 13:40:43.451230 close(0) = -1 EBADF (Ungültiger Dateideskriptor) 22586 13:40:43.451689 close(20) = 0 22586 13:40:43.452104 close(1) = 0 22586 13:40:43.452481 close(21) = 0 22586 13:40:43.452679 close(2) = 0 22586 13:40:43.452860 close(2) = -1 EBADF (Ungültiger Dateideskriptor) 1009 13:40:43.454112 close(21) = 0 22586 13:40:43.454522 close(8) = 0 22586 13:40:43.455428 close(8) = 0 22586 13:40:43.455976 close(8) = 0 22586 13:40:43.456852 close(8) = 0 22587 13:40:43.463115 close(8) = 0 22587 13:40:43.464074 close(8) = 0 22587 13:40:43.464682 close(8) = 0 22587 13:40:43.465463 close(8) = 0 22587 13:40:43.468229 close(8) = 0 22587 13:40:43.468737 close(1 <unfinished ...=""> 1009 13:40:43.468805 close(20 <unfinished ...=""> 22587 13:40:43.468849 <... close resumed> ) = 0 1009 13:40:43.468896 <... close resumed> ) = 0 22587 13:40:43.468942 close(2) = 0 22587 13:40:43.469504 +++ exited with 0 +++ 22586 13:40:43.469670 --- SIGCHLD {si_signo=SIGCHLD, si_code=CLD_EXITED, si_pid=22587, si_uid=0, si_status=0, si_utime=0, si_stime=1} --- 22586 13:40:43.470175 +++ exited with 0 +++ 1009 13:40:43.470265 close(20) = 0 546 13:40:43.470577 --- SIGCHLD {si_signo=SIGCHLD, si_code=CLD_EXITED, si_pid=22586, si_uid=0, si_status=0, si_utime=0, si_stime=2} --- 1035 13:40:43.470913 close(20) = -1 EBADF (Ungültiger Dateideskriptor) 22588 13:40:43.480352 --- SIGRT_7 {si_signo=SIGRT_7, si_code=SI_TKILL, si_pid=546, si_uid=0} --- 22588 13:40:43.481675 --- SIGRT_6 {si_signo=SIGRT_6, si_code=SI_TKILL, si_pid=546, si_uid=0} --- 22588 13:40:43.482410 +++ exited with 0 +++</unfinished></unfinished> Die Zeile 2025-04-17T11:40:43.471Z, 0x00000114, 4, 1, 0, **** ERROR: SysTaskCreate [CheckLicense0]: pthread_setname_np: Bad file descriptor zeigt, dass der EBADF-Fehler beim Versuch auftritt, einen neuen Thread namens "CheckLicense0" zu erstellen. Die Funktion pthread_setname_np() erhält einen EBADF-Fehler. Ich weiß leider nicht, ob das eine heiße Spur ist. Parallel dazu habe ich die Aufrufe von Systemfunktionen über SysProcess_Implementation.SysProcessExecuteCommand2 auskommentiert ohne den Fehler damit abzustellen. An diesem Punkt habe ich wegen Termindruck den alten Stand der Runtime (4.11.0.0) mit der Codesys Version 3.5 SP20 wiederhergestellt und die geänderten Programme und Visualisierungen manuell getauscht mit dem Ergebnis, dass der Fehler in den letzten 2 Stunden nicht mehr aufgetreten ist. Wenn jemand das Problem kennt, wäre ich für einen Austausch dankbar. Frohe Ostern!
Last updated: 2025-04-17