gatto

hi. My plc is weidmuller UC20-WL200-AC, IDE CODESYS 3.5.20.40, see picture for task settings. sometime i've got the plc stop. Reading the log, I find: EXCEPTIONPOSITION : IP=0x(nil) (no IECcontext could be retrieved) component CmpIecTask EXCEPTION [Watchdog] occurred: App=[Application], Task=[TASK_O_MAIN] component CmpIecTask How to find the position of problem?

Sorry, I've never used Raspy. Maybe someone else can help. From personal experience, I've had license activation issues, but it was caused by my company firewall, which was blocking traffic from the Codesys license server. So I found that the license was listed as activated on the server (and therefore used and no longer activable), but it wasn't present in the PLC. I solved the problem by using an unblocked internet connection when I needed to activate the purchased license ticket. Since then, the...

Hi. What type of PLC do you have? What activation method do you use? What license ticket did you purchase and want to activate? Can you describe the process you followed step by step?

I answer myself: xyz : ARRAY [1..10] OF BYTE := [10(BYTE#100)] ; // no warning :-)

I answer myself: xyz : ARRAY [1..10] OF BYTE := [10(BYTE#100)] ; // no warning :-)

Good morning dear codesys users. I'm using 3.5.20.40 and I get this warning C0195 when I assign an initial value to xyz. However, if I do it on a single byte (abc), it doesn't display any warning. Why? VAR_GLOBAL abc : BYTE := 100 ; xyz : ARRAY [1..10] OF BYTE := [10(100)] ; END_VAR

Hello, thank you for letting me know.

Hello, I’m in Codesys 3.5.20.40 and I try to declare the variable ´var1´ but I get an error. here : https://content.helpme-codesys.com/en/CODESYS%20Development%20System/_cds_rules.html i read : Backtick identifiers By using backticks, characters can also be used in identifiers that are not normally permitted in identifiers, such as special characters. The acute accent character is used for backticks: ´ (Unicode: U+02CA) The use of backticks is recommended in order to be able to use the same identifiers...