I'm new to IEC 61131-3 programming. Could someone clarify what the assignment operator (":=") in ST does when working with strings.
E.g. myString := originalString;
I was assuming this does a full character by character copy of the string, but I know in some lanuages only a reference pointer is copied. Now I wonder if my assumption is incorrect since there is string copy function in the system string library - SysStrCpy() in SysLibStr.lib.
I've had some strange bugs happening ever since I started using strings and SFC (SFCCurrentStep in particular) and want to make sure I am using strings correctly.
Any feeback on STRING usage is appreciated.
Sebastian Hutten
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
You are right. ':=' is a full character by character copy. (Certainly you may get a pointer to string see. ADR operator). Moreover you can use '=','>','<' in ST (but not '+', use CONCAT function). For example:
IF s2 = 'Shutten' THEN
s1:=CONCAT('Hello Mr.',s2);
END_IF
I advice you to use string functions from (LEN, LEFT, FIND etc. see 'String functions' in the manual) instead SysLibsβ¦. (platform dependent).
One limitation: do not use the same string functions in different tasks.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Hi, its a very old topic but still valid. I have a question regarding the statement >Zitat:
do not use the same string functions in different tasks
I already found that recommendation or hint, that STRING functions from the standard library are not programmed to be reentrant.
Okay, usually its clear. But can you tell me why?
If I need STRING functions in POUs outsourced in libraries, do have to avoid the usage oif the functions from this Standard lib!?
Which should I use else?
Thank you for your support.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Hi,
I'm new to IEC 61131-3 programming. Could someone clarify what the assignment operator (":=") in ST does when working with strings.
E.g. myString := originalString;
I was assuming this does a full character by character copy of the string, but I know in some lanuages only a reference pointer is copied. Now I wonder if my assumption is incorrect since there is string copy function in the system string library - SysStrCpy() in SysLibStr.lib.
I've had some strange bugs happening ever since I started using strings and SFC (SFCCurrentStep in particular) and want to make sure I am using strings correctly.
Any feeback on STRING usage is appreciated.
Sebastian Hutten
Hi
You are right. ':=' is a full character by character copy. (Certainly you may get a pointer to string see. ADR operator). Moreover you can use '=','>','<' in ST (but not '+', use CONCAT function). For example:
IF s2 = 'Shutten' THEN
END_IF
I advice you to use string functions from (LEN, LEFT, FIND etc. see 'String functions' in the manual) instead SysLibsβ¦. (platform dependent).
One limitation: do not use the same string functions in different tasks.
Hi, its a very old topic but still valid. I have a question regarding the statement >Zitat:
do not use the same string functions in different tasks
I already found that recommendation or hint, that STRING functions from the standard library are not programmed to be reentrant.
Okay, usually its clear. But can you tell me why?
If I need STRING functions in POUs outsourced in libraries, do have to avoid the usage oif the functions from this Standard lib!?
Which should I use else?
Thank you for your support.