Why moving away from IEC 61131-3 standard?
I would rather see every manufacturer moving towards IEC 61131-3 standard so that it would be easier to move ST code between platforms.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
yannickasselin1 hat geschrieben:
I would just vote against it!
Why moving away from IEC 61131-3 standard?
I would rather see every manufacturer moving towards IEC 61131-3 standard so that it would be easier to move ST code between platforms.
It was actually kind of a joke even if I would like to see it
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2017-12-22
Originally created by: scott_cunningham
I would not want to be that guy standing next to a broken machine, called in on Christmas, only to find out that variable MoveDrive was used instead of moveDrive!
A big part of what I like about IEC61131 over C language is lack of small syntax bugs!
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Dear 3S Smart Software Team
Can you please make your IDE for Structured Text code case sensitive? (Just ignore the IEC-61131-3 standard).
Thank you!
Cheers, merry X-Mas!
I would just vote against it!
Why moving away from IEC 61131-3 standard?
I would rather see every manufacturer moving towards IEC 61131-3 standard so that it would be easier to move ST code between platforms.
It was actually kind of a joke even if I would like to see it
Originally created by: scott_cunningham
I would not want to be that guy standing next to a broken machine, called in on Christmas, only to find out that variable MoveDrive was used instead of moveDrive!
A big part of what I like about IEC61131 over C language is lack of small syntax bugs!