OMG I didn’t know that at all. Those models of Q Series is called not PLC but “C Lang Controller” in Japan. I searched for the information about C Lang Controller with CODESYS right now in Japanese but there was no information. Maybe it’s because Japanese PLC engineers don’t desire the OOP. Anyway, I appreciate you. I’m glad to know that a leading vendor in Japan support CODESYS, thank you!
Really? I haven't heard that ever. I googled about it but I could get no information. Can you show me any information??
Hmm I see. Then CODESYS is the first PLC with OOP and it has advantage about OOP, right? In Japan, Mitsubishi's PLC is the most popular, and the second, OMRON or KEYENCE. But they don't have OOP or even enough IEC61131-3 programming. I'm working at kinda advanced software house with industrial software, but its PLC members still only use ladder logic. I'm wondering if I should leave it...
Thank you for your reply aliazzz! Okay, I'll try to keep learning OOP with CODESYS, thank you. How do you think about CODESYS's market share? I heard Siemence and Rockwell are leading vendors in the world market. But in Japan, they are rarely chosen and I don't know whether the market share PLCs with CODESYS are growing or not. Do you have any thoughts and feeling about it?
Hello. I'm a Japanese young engineer who's started learning CODESYS thesedays. I wanna know how prevalent OOP with PLC is in the world. Actually, it's still common to only use ladder logic with (and a little bit ST and FB provided vendors) without OOP in Japan. I'm expecting and hoping that OOP with PLC will get prevalent also in Japan and that's why I started learning CODESYS. In your country, how prevalent is OOP? And is the PLCs other than CODESYS equipped with OOP fanction? I'm wondering if my...