Activity for getdone

  • getdone getdone modified a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    I ran a X-Y gantry using codesys CNC. All codes and setting were same, except of feeding speed. And in a low speed, the SMC_Interpolator ran well with a continuous piSetPosition output; but when the speed exceeded a certain value, the piSetPosition changed stepply, showed in the attached picture. I tried several tests, here are the results: When cycle time was 1ms, the feeding speed <5 mm/s, ran smoothly. And speed > 5 mm/s, ran stepply. When cycle time was 2ms, the feeding speed <15 mm/s, ran smoothly....

  • getdone getdone modified a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    I ran a X-Y gantry using codesys CNC. All codes and setting were same, except of feeding speed. And in a low speed, the SMC_Interpolator ran well with a continuous piSetPosition output; but when the speed exceeded a certain value, the piSetPosition changed stepply, showed in the attached picture. I tried several tests, here are the results: When cycle time was 1ms, the feeding speed <5 mm/s, ran smoothly. And speed > 5 mm/s, ran stepply. When cycle time was 2ms, the feeding speed <15 mm/s, ran smoothly....

  • getdone getdone modified a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    I ran a X-Y gantry using codesys CNC. All codes and setting were same, except of feeding speed. And in a low speed, the SMC_Interpolator ran well with a continuous piSetPosition output; but when the speed exceeded a certain value, the piSetPosition changed stepply, showed in the following picture. I tried several tests, here are the results: When cycle time was 1ms, the feeding speed <5 mm/s, ran smoothly. And speed > 5 mm/s, ran stepply. When cycle time was 2ms, the feeding speed <15 mm/s, ran smoothly....

  • getdone getdone modified a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    I ran a X-Y gantry using codesys CNC. All codes and setting were same, except of feeding speed. And in a low speed, the SMC_Interpolator ran well with a continuous piSetPosition output; but when the speed exceeded a certain value, the piSetPosition changed stepply, showed in the following picture. I tried several tests, here are the results: When cycle time was 1ms, the feeding speed <5 mm/s, ran smoothly. And speed > 5 mm/s, ran stepply. When cycle time was 2ms, the feeding speed <15 mm/s, ran smoothly....

  • getdone getdone modified a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    I ran a X-Y gantry using codesys CNC. All codes and setting were same, except of feeding speed. And in a low speed, the SMC_Interpolator ran well with a continuous piSetPosition output; but when the speed exceeded a certain value, the piSetPosition changed stepply, showed in the following picture. I tried several tests, here are the results: When cycle time was 1ms, the feeding speed <5 mm/s, ran smoothly. And speed > 5 mm/s, ran stepply. When cycle time was 2ms, the feeding speed <15 mm/s, ran smoothly....

  • getdone getdone posted a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    I ran a X-Y gantry using codesys CNC. All codes and setting were same, except of feeding speed. And in a low speed, the SMC_Interpolator ran well with a continuous piSetPosition output; but when the speed exceeded a certain value, the piSetPosition changed stepply, showed in the following picture. I tried several tests, here are the results: When cycle time was 1ms, the feeding speed <5 mm/s, ran smoothly. And speed > 5 mm/s, ran stepply. When cycle time was 2ms, the feeding speed <15 mm/s, ran smoothly....

  • getdone getdone posted a comment on discussion Motion πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Thank you! This help me too.

  • getdone getdone modified a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    In the "Trace Configuration" - "Advanced Trace Setting", for the option "Measure in every n-th cycle", its help says, "Data recording in every n task cycle", which means the time interval should be "n x task cycle time". But I found in the trace data file, the time interval of the data recording was same with the value of this option, rather than the time "n x cycle time". I don't know if it is a bug, and glad to let you know this thing.

  • getdone getdone posted a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    In the "Trace Configuration" - "Advanced Trace Setting", for the option "Measure in every n-th cycle", its help says, "Data recording in every n task cycle", which means the time interval should be "n x task cycle time". But I found in the trace data file, the time interval of the data recording was same with the value of this option, rather than the time "n x cycle time". I don't know if it is a bug, and glad to let you know.

  • getdone getdone modified a comment on discussion Motion πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    I am coding a gantry application, and be confused about the interpolation cycle time. There is an option in "CNC settings" - "Preinterpolation" - "Cycle time". Its help says, "Cycle time [Β΅s]: here the interpolation time can be set. Default value is 20000Β΅s""Interpolation time and cycle time have to match for identical behavior of CNC editor and online application. This applies for the task that calls the interpolator." And for FB SMC_Interpolator, there is a input "dwIpoTime". Its help says, "This...

  • getdone getdone posted a comment on discussion Motion πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    I am coding a gantry application, and be confused about the interpolation cycle time. There is an option in "CNC settings" - "Preinterpolation" - "Cycle time". Its help says, "Cycle time [Β΅s]: here the interpolation time can be set. Default value is 20000Β΅s""Interpolation time and cycle time have to match for identical behavior of CNC editor and online application. This applies for the task that calls the interpolator." And for FB SMC_Interpolator, there is a input "dwIpoTime". Its help says, "This...

1