These FBs have also several methods. I declare them as follows in code:
VARcoil1:CDL.Coil<(maxEvents:=1)>;END_VAR
and when using them in ST, I have no problems. However, when trying to use them in FDB, I do not know how to do that, as some strange misalignment happens.
Here's what happens:
When I add the block to my FBD canvas and assign coil1 as the instance name, the compiler throws this error:
'coil1' is not an instance of 'CDL.Coil<(maxEvents:=1)>'.
Same occurs when I try to instantiate blocks such as 'coil1.turnOn' or similar.
Here is what I have already tried, none of which worked:
- Deleting the <(maxEvents:=1)> parameter from the text inside the FBD box.
- Deleting the block entirely, dropping an "Empty Box", and typing coil1 above it to let the IDE auto-complete and format the block.
- Running a full "Clean All" and rebuilding the code.
I am aware that I could bypass the graphical editor by calling it in Structured Text. However, I need to keep this logic compatible to FBD.
Has anyone encountered this specific FBD parsing bug with generic variables?
Thanks in advance for any insights.
Best regards,
Marco
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Hello everyone,
I am running into a highly frustrating issue in the FBD editor regarding a Function Block with generic constants (VAR_GENERIC CONSTANT).
I created a FB using ST, with a generic var, useful for having a variable sized array, as follows:
These FBs have also several methods. I declare them as follows in code:
and when using them in ST, I have no problems. However, when trying to use them in FDB, I do not know how to do that, as some strange misalignment happens.
Here's what happens:
When I add the block to my FBD canvas and assign coil1 as the instance name, the compiler throws this error:
'coil1' is not an instance of 'CDL.Coil<(maxEvents:=1)>'.
Same occurs when I try to instantiate blocks such as 'coil1.turnOn' or similar.
Here is what I have already tried, none of which worked:
- Deleting the <(maxEvents:=1)> parameter from the text inside the FBD box.
- Deleting the block entirely, dropping an "Empty Box", and typing coil1 above it to let the IDE auto-complete and format the block.
- Running a full "Clean All" and rebuilding the code.
I am aware that I could bypass the graphical editor by calling it in Structured Text. However, I need to keep this logic compatible to FBD.
Has anyone encountered this specific FBD parsing bug with generic variables?
Thanks in advance for any insights.
Best regards,
Marco