Post by eschwellinger on Reset device password Festo PLC ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
these credentials are saved in the plc - you need to ask Festo how to do this.
Last updated: 2026-08-13

Post by blisk2000 on Scheduler ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hi, I am looking for a scheduler like attached picture. Is a scheduler like this already available in Codesys? Thank you! Best regards! Zdenko
Last updated: 2026-01-16

Post by baott569 on Limitation on OPC UA Variable 100+ variables on raspberry pi ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Sorry, not trying to spam, My internet lagged and I thought the comment wasn’t submitted
Last updated: 2026-01-22

Post by baott569 on Limitation on OPC UA Variable 100+ variables on raspberry pi ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hi, did you manage to resolve this issue?, I’m experiencing the same problem
Last updated: 2026-01-22

Two licenses have to be installed forgot to enable one license ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
Two licenses have to be installed forgot to enable one license
Last updated: 2026-02-03

Post by winki on Error in licence activation ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
I am using Codesys Control for linux ARM64 SL. Installed with the SL deployment tool
Last updated: 2026-02-03

Post by hetongapp on The selected container ... does not fit your ticket ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Do you fixed the issues about container serial number different?
Last updated: 2026-02-07

Post by dosnova on *exception* [processorloadwatchdog] occurred in: app=[all], task=[all] ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Weintek Codesys firmware update does not solve this problem..
Last updated: 2026-02-10

Post by dosnova on *exception* [processorloadwatchdog] occurred in: app=[all], task=[all] ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
I've the same problem. I'm not able to solve..
Last updated: 2026-02-10

Post by eschwellinger on Control for Linux ARM64-User Management issue ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
guess you'll need to use latest CODESYS version to fix this.
Last updated: 2026-02-14

Post by eschwellinger on Unable to deploy "Control for Linux SL 4.18.0.0" ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
we need the Systeminformation in the Communication tap(logged in)
Last updated: 2026-02-17

Post by pernockham on Unable to deploy "Control for Linux SL 4.18.0.0" ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Correct, my Device architecture says "None" is this position. A missing config somewhere?
Last updated: 2026-02-18

Post by pernockham on Unable to deploy "Control for Linux SL 4.18.0.0" ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Thanks! Out of office, will check on Monday.
Last updated: 2026-02-19

Question about Demo License limitations for Modbus TCP communication and Fieldbus Instances ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
Question about Demo License limitations for Modbus TCP communication and Fieldbus Instances
Last updated: 2026-02-28

AM243 LaunchPad as PROFINET Device with CODESYS – RPC Aborted error when scanning devices ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
AM243 LaunchPad as PROFINET Device with CODESYS – RPC Aborted error when scanning devices
Last updated: 2026-03-13

Modbus TCP Server connection is ESTABLISHED but all holding registers are value 0? ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
Modbus TCP Server connection is ESTABLISHED but all holding registers are value 0?
Last updated: 2026-04-09

Post by husarz17 on How change Unity-ID in TCP Modbus Slave ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hi nulltrace, Thanks for the info. I'm waiting to hear back from you. Take care!
Last updated: 2026-04-13

Post by husarz17 on Pi as Modbus TCP slave. Errors ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hi, I have similar issue. Is that possible to use more than 4096 registers with Modbus RTU slave?
Last updated: 2026-04-29

Post by jroddball79 on PM556-TP-ETH — How to change IP address without overwriting the PLC program? ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
We have checked open ports. SSH (22) and HTTP (80) are not reachable. The only open ports are: 502 (Modbus TCP — used for lighting control) 1200 (CODESYS runtime) 1201 (CODESYS runtime) We can connect via Automation Builder using the current IP, but we don't have the original project source — only an empty project. This is why we are afraid of doing a full download, as it would overwrite the running application. Is there any way to change the IP through the CODESYS runtime protocol on ports 1200/1201 without affecting the running program?"
Last updated: 2026-05-20

PM556-TP-ETH — How to change IP address without overwriting the PLC program? ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
PM556-TP-ETH — How to change IP address without overwriting the PLC program?
Last updated: 2026-05-22

Post by fabiodasilveira on Dynamic Setting IP Address from IEC code ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
It is a shame that it does not work with Eaton XC303 PLCs :(
Last updated: 2026-06-23

Post by arj3090 on Linux ARM64 Deploy Fail - Index out of range ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
This is the version shown in the CodeSys Installer.
Last updated: 2026-07-01

Post by kuegerls on PROFINET Controller SL: WRREC remains BUSY forever, no DCE/RPC packets transmitted (RevPi Connect 5 + NORD SK205E) ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hello , I am currently evaluating the CODESYS PROFINET Controller SL on a Revolution Pi Connect 5 and have encountered a problem with acyclic PROFINET Record Access (WRREC/RDREC). System Hardware: Revolution Pi Connect 5 Runtime: CODESYS Control 4.16.0.0 (SDK 3.5.21.10) Development System: CODESYS V3.5 SP21 (64-bit) CommFB: 3.5.17.10 ProfinetCommon: 4.6.0.0 PROFINET Controller Device: PN-Controller 4.6.0.0 PROFINET Device: NORD DRIVESYSTEMS SK205E with SK TU4-PNT GSDML: GSDML-V2.46-NORDDRIVESYSTEMS-PNT-20251016.xml Network The PROFINET network is completely separated from the office network. RevPi: eth0 → Office network eth1 → PROFINET wlan0 → Visualization The PN Controller is configured to use eth1. IP configuration: RevPi (eth1): 192.168.100.1/24 NORD Drive: 192.168.100.3 Connection is established successfully. Current Status The PN Controller reports: Controller Status = Run Online = TRUE IP Active = TRUE Connections = 1 Cyclic PROFINET IO communication works correctly. Problem I am trying to access PKW parameters via WRREC (Record Index 100). The request buffer contains: 01 14 00 04 92 00 00 00 00 00 00 which corresponds to Reference = 0x01 Request = Read Axis = 0 Parameter = 170 + 1000 Subindex = 0 Value = 0 The WRREC call is fbWRREC( REQ := xWrReq, ID := ConnectionID, INDEX := 100, LEN := 11, RECORD := ADR(TxBuffer) ); REQ is pulsed for one PLC cycle only. Observed Behaviour WRREC enters BUSY state and never finishes. Observed values: BUSY = TRUE DONE = FALSE ERROR = FALSE STATUS = 16#FFFFFFFF indefinitely. Packet Capture A Wireshark capture was taken on the PROFINET network. Observed traffic: PROFINET RT LLDP DCP Observed: successful cyclic IO Not observed: DCE/RPC Record Write Record Read RPC Bind No RPC packets are transmitted at all. Diagnostic Messages The controller repeatedly reports AR alarm.ind(err) AR CMI timeout although cyclic IO communication continues to work. Already Verified The following points have already been checked: correct Ethernet interface (eth1) correct CREATE_ID result correct Device ID correct Slot/Subslot correct GSDML correct REQ pulse RECORD buffer is larger than LEN cyclic IO communication works different Record Indices (100...104) tested Question Is there any known issue or limitation where WRREC/RDREC requests remain permanently BUSY and no RPC Record Access packets are generated? Could this behaviour be related to Runtime 4.16.0.0, PN Controller 4.6.0.0, the missing runtime license (currently running in demo mode), or any known issue with the PROFINET Controller SL? I am currently evaluating the PROFINET Controller SL and therefore the runtime is operating in demo mode. Could you please confirm whether WRREC/RDREC (acyclic Record Data services) are fully supported in demo mode, or whether a valid license is required for these services? If required, I can provide: complete project archive Wireshark capture (.pcap) GSDML online screenshots diagnostic log Thank you very much for your help. Best regards, Stefan
Last updated: 2026-07-17

Post by gurke258 on Codesys Safety EtherCAT with Beckhoff ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hello :) We are currently configuring a system with Codesys as SoftPLC on a Linux system and with Beckhoff terminals. I have already gained some experience with Codesys and also with TwinCat incl. TwinCAT Safety. What is new to me now is Codesys in conjunction with Beckhoff safety terminals. We are currently using an EL1918 & EL2904 here. I have been able to integrate both terminals into my project, but I don't know how to interconnect them so that they communicate. That's a bit easier with Twincat ^^ Can any of you help me? I would also prefer a Codesys EtherCAT Safety training or webinar if anyone knows of one. Unfortunately I can't find such an event on the internet.
Last updated: 2023-11-07

Post by nilesh on Request for Assistance with Online Logic Changes in PLC System using Codesys ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Dear Sir, We are writing to seek guidance regarding our current situation with the Opto 22 Groov EPIC PR1 PLC system. Over the past year, we have successfully downloaded and implemented logic using Codesys, and the PLC has been operational without issues. However, we now require minor modifications to the logic. Despite attempting to upload the modified logic, we are unable to see the "online change" option, prompting us to consider a direct logic download. Our concern is that during this process, certain digital outputs or analog outputs might momentarily disrupt operations, which is unacceptable given the system's continuous 24x7 operation. We have explored online changes in other PLC systems, but due to the absence of the last downloaded backup, we are unable to proceed confidently.
Last updated: 2024-03-01

Sort by relevance or date