Post by baotthitawat on Cloud SCADA for Industrial Energy Monitoring ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Recently I’ve been exploring ATSCADA iEnergy Tools for SCADA-based energy monitoring systems. One thing I find interesting is how modern SCADA platforms are evolving beyond traditional machine monitoring. Many industrial systems are now using Cloud SCADA architectures for centralized energy management, remote dashboards, and operational analytics. ATSCADA iEnergy Tools supports: Real-time energy monitoring Historical data logging MySQL integration Reporting and Excel export Remote SCADA dashboards Cloud-based monitoring systems I think this type of solution is practical for factories, power monitoring applications, building management systems, and other industrial automation projects where energy optimization is becoming increasingly important. Industrial automation is clearly moving toward web-based and cloud-connected SCADA platforms, especially as more facilities focus on digital transformation and smarter energy management
Last updated: 2026-05-26

Post by baotthitawat on Cloud SCADA for Industrial Energy Monitoring ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Recently I’ve been exploring ATSCADA iEnergy Tools for SCADA-based energy monitoring systems. One thing I find interesting is how modern SCADA platforms are evolving beyond traditional machine monitoring. Many industrial systems are now using Cloud SCADA architectures for centralized energy management, remote dashboards, and operational analytics. ATSCADA iEnergy Tools supports: Real-time energy monitoring Historical data logging MySQL integration Reporting and Excel export Remote SCADA dashboards Cloud-based monitoring systems I think this type of solution is practical for factories, power monitoring applications, building management systems, and other industrial automation projects where energy optimization is becoming increasingly important. Industrial automation is clearly moving toward web-based and cloud-connected SCADA platforms, especially as more facilities focus on digital transformation and smarter energy management
Last updated: 2026-05-26

Cloud SCADA for Industrial Energy Monitoring ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
Cloud SCADA for Industrial Energy Monitoring
Last updated: 2026-05-26

Post by lofty on CODESYS Download Issue ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
I am attempting to install CODESYS 3.5.22.20 and the installer gets stuck at "Install Package CODESYS Compatibility Package 3.5.17.20" every single time. I've tried reinstalling the software multiple times and the same issue persists. I've tried running the installer as an administrator and even turned off my virus protection and the same issue persists. I've attached a photo for reference. Has anyone run into this issue before or have any idea what I can do to complete the install?
Last updated: 2026-05-26

CODESYS Download Issue ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
CODESYS Download Issue
Last updated: 2026-05-26

SCADA Systems Are Becoming Easier to Integrate With Modern Applications ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
SCADA Systems Are Becoming Easier to Integrate With Modern Applications
Last updated: 2026-05-28

Post by baotthitawat on SCADA Systems Are Becoming Easier to Integrate With Modern Applications ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
One thing I’ve been seeing recently is that more industrial systems are starting to expose realtime SCADA data through APIs instead of keeping everything isolated inside the local monitoring software. This makes integration much easier for cloud platforms, mobile dashboards, AI analytics, and enterprise applications that need realtime industrial data. Instead of exporting reports manually or building complicated middleware, APIs allow external systems to access SCADA data directly in realtime. I think this becomes especially useful for applications like wastewater treatment monitoring, where operators need better visibility into alarms, equipment status, and operational conditions across different locations. Feels like modern SCADA is slowly evolving from a standalone monitoring platform into part of a larger connected industrial ecosystem.
Last updated: 2026-05-28

Post by baotthitawat on SCADA Systems Are Becoming Easier to Integrate With Modern Applications ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
One thing I’ve been seeing recently is that more industrial systems are starting to expose realtime SCADA data through APIs instead of keeping everything isolated inside the local monitoring software. This makes integration much easier for cloud platforms, mobile dashboards, AI analytics, and enterprise applications that need realtime industrial data. Instead of exporting reports manually or building complicated middleware, APIs allow external systems to access SCADA data directly in realtime. I think this becomes especially useful for applications like wastewater treatment monitoring, where operators need better visibility into alarms, equipment status, and operational conditions across different locations. Feels like modern SCADA is slowly evolving from a standalone monitoring platform into part of a larger connected industrial ecosystem.
Last updated: 2026-05-28

Post by baotthitawat on SCADA Systems Are Becoming Easier to Integrate With Modern Applications ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
One thing I’ve been seeing recently is that more industrial systems are starting to expose realtime SCADA data through APIs instead of keeping everything isolated inside the local monitoring software. This makes integration much easier for cloud platforms, mobile dashboards, AI analytics, and enterprise applications that need realtime industrial data. Instead of exporting reports manually or building complicated middleware, APIs allow external systems to access SCADA data directly in realtime. I think this becomes especially useful for applications like wastewater treatment monitoring, where operators need better visibility into alarms, equipment status, and operational conditions across different locations. Feels like modern SCADA is slowly evolving from a standalone monitoring platform into part of a larger connected industrial ecosystem.
Last updated: 2026-05-28

Post by baotthitawat on SCADA Systems Are Becoming Easier to Integrate With Modern Applications ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
One thing I’ve been seeing recently is that more industrial systems are starting to expose realtime SCADA data through APIs instead of keeping everything isolated inside the local monitoring software. This makes integration much easier for cloud platforms, mobile dashboards, AI analytics, and enterprise applications that need realtime industrial data. Instead of exporting reports manually or building complicated middleware, APIs allow external systems to access SCADA data directly in realtime. I think this becomes especially useful for applications like wastewater treatment monitoring, where operators need better visibility into alarms, equipment status, and operational conditions across different locations. Feels like modern SCADA is slowly evolving from a standalone monitoring platform into part of a larger connected industrial ecosystem.
Last updated: 2026-05-28

SCADA Systems Are Becoming Easier to Integrate With Modern Applications ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
SCADA Systems Are Becoming Easier to Integrate With Modern Applications
Last updated: 2026-05-28

SCADA Systems Are Becoming Easier to Integrate With Modern Applications ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
SCADA Systems Are Becoming Easier to Integrate With Modern Applications
Last updated: 2026-05-28

SCADA Systems Are Becoming Easier to Integrate With Modern Applications ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
SCADA Systems Are Becoming Easier to Integrate With Modern Applications
Last updated: 2026-05-28

Post by totorovic on Ladder editor bug with 3.5.21.20 ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Ladder version is 1.1.0.0
Last updated: 2026-05-28

Post by shamcke on Array with generic constant as persistent variable ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hello, I have written a function block that uses a generic constant for the upper bound of an array. I wanted to have this array in the persistent memory area, thus I constructed my FB as follows: FUNCTION_BLOCK FbWithGenericArrayLength VAR_GENERIC CONSTANT uiArrayLength : UINT := 10; END_VAR VAR PERSISTENT arr : ARRAY[1..uiArrayLength] OF INT; END_VAR In my PLC_PRG I declare an instance of said FB PROGRAM PLC_PRG VAR myFb : FbWithGenericArrayLength<10>; END_VAR This compiles just fine. When I let CODESYS fill my persistent list, it adds duplicate entries {attribute 'qualified_only'} VAR_GLOBAL PERSISTENT RETAIN // Generated instance path of persistent variable PLC_PRG.myFb.arr: ARRAY [1..uiArrayLength] OF INT; // Generated instance path of persistent variable PLC_PRG.myFb.arr: ARRAY [1..uiArrayLength] OF INT; END_VAR so I manually delete the duplicate. When i now compile, I get errors ------ Build started: Application: Device.Sim.Device.Application ------- Typify code... [ERROR] Sandbox_FW31: PersistentVars [Device: PLC Logic: Application](Line 4): C0161: Border 'uiArrayLength' of array is no constant value [ERROR] Sandbox_FW31: PersistentVars [Device: PLC Logic: Application](Line 4): Type of mapped variable is not equal to original type Compile complete -- 2 errors, 0 warnings Build complete -- 2 errors, 0 warnings : No download possible Is is simply not possible to use a generic constant for the persistent array? Thanks in advance. Edit: It seems I can manually replace the uiArrayLength in the persisten list by the value 10 I used as the generic constant for this particular instance.
Last updated: 2026-05-29

Post by eschwellinger on Ladder editor bug with 3.5.21.20 ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hi, could you please update to Ladder 1.2.0.0 via CODESYS Installer and check if this is still in?
Last updated: 2026-06-01

Post by alex-n on Problem with keeping up the distance between two axes ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
We use Inovance AC802 as PLC, IS810N Drive, library 4.10, connection via Ethercat and no any suprise at work.
Last updated: 2026-06-02

Post by eschwellinger on too much data for the controller ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Retains used in the project?
Last updated: 2026-06-02

too much data for the controller ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
too much data for the controller
Last updated: 2026-06-02

Post by eschwellinger on Problem with keeping up the distance between two axes ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Which controller which version which SoftMotion Drive... realtime problems?
Last updated: 2026-06-02

Post by totorovic on Ladder editor bug with 3.5.21.20 ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
The update via CODESYS Installer fails (admin mode). Anyway I am switching all my POUs from Ladder to ST because Ladder cannot be used like this.
Last updated: 2026-06-02

Ladder editor bug with 3.5.21.20 ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
Ladder editor bug with 3.5.21.20
Last updated: 2026-06-02

Post by alex-n on Problem with keeping up the distance between two axes ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hello. I have a task to synchronize the movement of two axes and maintain the distance between them. First axe makes equal steps by trigger using MC_MoveRelative function. The second one is standstill and after another signal should catch up the first one from its position to a specified distance and keep it. I've tried to use MC_Phasing and mostly it works. Second axis catches up the first and starts make step with it. But in one moment this axis can crash into the first and there is no clear connection as to why this is happening. It can work correct for a day or for a week.
Last updated: 2026-06-04

TextList name error (fake) ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
TextList name error (fake)
Last updated: 2026-06-05

Post by kevinl on Weidmüller und u-OS bugs ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hallo zusammen Wir setzen mehrere Weidmüller UC20-WL2000 mit CODESYS Runtime und System-Bus ein und kämpfen seit einiger Zeit mit Problemen, für die wir bisher keine Ursache finden konnten. Aktuell beobachten wir zwei Phänomene: System-Bus Probleme Bei einer Anlage verlieren die I/O-Module sporadisch die Verbindung. Im Log erscheinen Meldungen wie: SLIO:CheckModule missing NotReachable Module Unplugged Nach diversen Updates (u-OS 2.7, aktuelle Runtime, aktuelles CODESYS) wurde das Verhalten eher schlechter statt besser. Anfangs traten die Fehler sporadisch auf, inzwischen funktioniert der System-Bus teilweise gar nicht mehr. Auch ein Downgrade auf eine ältere u-OS Version half nicht wirklich, aber ev ist es mit der aktuellen Runtime nicht kompatibel. Probleme nach Spannungsunterbruch / Neustart Mehrfach hatten wir bereits den Fall, dass eine Steuerung nach einem Spannungsunterbruch oder Neustart nicht mehr vollständig hochkommt. Teilweise startet die CODESYS Runtime nicht mehr (vermutlich aufgrund von Problemen mit Persistent-Daten), in einem aktuellen Fall ist zusätzlich das u-OS Backend nicht mehr erreichbar. Die Welcome-Seite erscheint noch, beim Login läuft der Request jedoch in einen 504 Gateway Timeout. Hardware: UC20-WL2000 u-OS 2.x System-Bus mit mehreren UR20 Modulen CODESYS Control SL Runtime Mich würde interessieren: Hat jemand ähnliche Erfahrungen mit UC20-WL2000 oder u-OS gemacht? Gibt es bekannte Probleme mit dem System-Bus? Gibt es Workarounds bezüglich Persistent-Daten oder Recovery nach Spannungsunterbruch? Hat jemand ähnliche 504-Fehler im u-OS Backend gesehen? Vielen Dank für jeden Hinweis.
Last updated: 2026-06-05

Sort by relevance or date