Currently a pre-alpha results.xml is generated.
This said, when the logo is pressed from the app the dissapearing and reappearing menu makes sense. However, it doesn't make sense to me in a full blown browser. IMHO I don't mind the side menu at all, it even better if it's always there, available to me. So, can you differentiate the click-event from the browser agent/platform? E.g. If the button is pressed from the app, something else happens then if the button is pressed from a real webbrowser (non mobile platform).
This said, when the logo is pressed from the app the dissapearing and reappearing menu makes sense. However, it doesn't make sense in a full blown browser! So, can you differentiate the click-event from the browser agent/platform? E.g. If the button is pressed from the app, something else happens then if the button is pressed from a real webbrowser (non mobile platform).
This said, when the logo is pressed from within on a smaller screen (less real-estate) the appearing/dissapearing menu makes sens. However, it doesn't make sense in a full blown browser! Can you differentiate the click-event from the browser agent/platform?
clicking upper left cforge logo
CfUnit API Reference keeps showing up as 'revised'
Error: The file 'formatinfo' is missing in the repository for visual elements
standalone XmlResultFormatter project
standalone XmlResultFormatter project
XmlFormatter Branche
Branch of CfUnit for debugging purpose
FB_StringBuffer renamed to FB_StreamBuffer
small fix
python scripting examples mssing because of licensing
footer
Project Overview
Project Overview
Ingo was right, there was a t missing!
atomic project v0.3.2.0
comments
Home
drone.yml
Home
root of the svn library
root of the svn library
update of
temporary move of files to enable project commit
Home
Library shrunk from 220MB to 470Kb
V0.3.2.0
binary update of library and project
FB_XmlFileFormatter: TODO Debug/build xmlfile further
v1.1.0.1
binary update of library and project
v1.1.0.1
v1.1.0.1 Modified CfUnitRunner to accomodate for the new introduced XmlFileFormatter
CfUnit Verifier for v1.1.0.1
Library/CfUnit.library v1.1.0.1
added code repo url
added code repo url
added code repo url
Trunk updated to v1.1.0.1
Trunk update v1.0.0.1
updated/added;
Home
No, You should declare a BYTE in the PLC Code byBitfield : BYTE; Then you can address each bit as follows; byBitfield.0 := xMyBool0; .. byBitfield.7 := xMyBool7; Try to avoid own DUT's (enums, structs) in the Devdesc.xml and stick to basic primitives like BYTE, DINT, REAL, WORD etc. This will make your life easier in editing the devdesc.xml. Offcourse if you want to use them, no problem, but you have to declare them in your code AND the devdes.xml file, so in two seperate places! Good luck
No, You should declare a BYTE in the PLC Code byBitfield : BYTE; Then you can address each bit as follows; byBitfield.0 := xMyBool0; .. byBitfield.7 := xMyBool7; Try to avoid own DUT's (enums, structs) and stick to basic primitives like BYTE, DINT, REAL, WORD etc. This will make your life easier. Good luck
No, You should declare a BYTE in the PLC Code byBitfield : BYTE; Then you can address each bit as follows; byBitfield.0 := xMyBool0; .. byBitfield.7 := xMyBool7; Try to avoid own DUT's (enums, structs) and stick to basic primitives like BYTE, DINT, REAL, WORD etc. Good luck
No, You should declare a BYTE byBitfield : BYTE; Then you can address each bit as follows; byBitfield.0 := xMyBool0; .. byBitfield.7 := xMyBool7; Good luck
https://forge.codesys.com/prj/cfunit/home/Tutorial/
various small text tweaks
small updates
v0.3.1.0