Personal Data

Username:
alrcastro
Joined:
2020-03-09 00:22:59
Location:
Rio de Janeiro / Brazil / -03
Gender:
Male

Projects

  • No projects to display.

User Activity

  • Posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ on CODESYS Forge

    I'm no longer working with this PLC brand, but if I were you, I would try to stop all related Codesys services before the copy and restart them after that.

  • Posted a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ on CODESYS Forge

    In addition to the above tip, your program is overlooking error codes for formatting and file access functions; it is always good practice to read these parameters.

  • Posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ on CODESYS Forge

    After leaving this question for a while, I made a further research and found the answer on the Codesys website itself, unfortunately not here in this community. For those with similar issue, just to share: https://www.codesys.com/news-events/press-releases/article/3s-smart-software-solutions-gmbh-becomes-codesys-gmbh.html

  • Modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ on CODESYS Forge

    Until some time ago, whenever we installed the PLC runtime in Windows, the following appeared in the container: 3S-Smart Software Solutions Softlicenses But now it's showing... CODESYS GmbH Softlicenses So far, this would not represent any problem, but our solution programmatically checks the existence of this license and displays it in the Webvisu. Has anyone else gone through this ?

  • Posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ on CODESYS Forge

    Until some time ago, whenever we installed the PLC runtime in Windows, the following appeared in the container: 3S-Smart Software Solutions Softlicenses But now it's showing... CODESYS GmbH Softlicenses So far, this would not represent any problem, but our solution programmatically checks the existence of this license and displays it in the Webvisu. Has anyone else gone through this ?

  • Posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ on CODESYS Forge

    Depending on the task configuration it won't work this way. I mean, the project I worked with, the time slice was 2ms for the fastest task, and the Wifi latency can easily reach and surpass this time. In other hand, if you are running a lightweight task for a bare interlock application, you can configure the task time slice for a mild value.

  • Posted a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ on CODESYS Forge

    Indeed, the license is binded not only to the hardware, but also to the OS itself, as for example, you cannot change the ETH port name nor the Host name itself, which is a problem if you need to update your system in order to comply with changes on your project.

  • Modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ on CODESYS Forge

    Thanks for your support, we'll try as you recommnded. BTW, Task1 is just for low speed procedures, not critical timmming constraints, whereas Task0 is for 'realtime' jobs.

View All