Discussion

FORUM LATEST POST # TOPICS
General Discussion

Forum about anything you want to talk about.

 How to turn on a GPIO from a device function block
by lwalbert
2022-09-29 		1

Recent Activities

    CODESYS Forge

  • darwin03 posted a comment on discussion Motion 🇬🇧

    Hi Georg, Thanks for your previous suggestion. I was able to resolve the issue! I'm now trying to build the 6DOF robot again, but I'm not sure why this is happening. Even when I simulate it in RoboDK using the joint angles from my code, the robot's motion still seems abnormal. Do you have any ideas what might be causing this? Thank you for taking the time to look into my question! Best regards, darwin03 Video link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PBqS4yIY2R_CZ3celSKz-BXVRk8pCHKz/view?usp=sharin...

  • Reinier Geers posted a comment on discussion Engineering 🇬🇧

    Hi i get a json value from an energy site. Every hour a value. to cut the answer in an array so i can read every hour it try FindWString . find Marketprice. But it turns in every array on a diverent position. Why ?

  • pernockham posted a comment on discussion Runtime 🇬🇧

    Solved finally, in short by: listening to eventId = EVT_CmpMgr_LicenseState, make a callback, extract the event-parameter which contains the RUNTIME_LICENSE_STATE. This gives me the license state as LICENSED / LICENSED_LOS / DEMOMODE etc. What Im not certain of at this point is this the aggregation of all three licenses or just the RUNTIME? Ie, what if my CONTROL-license is ok but my Visu-license is to low, will that set LICENSE_LOST, or would I need other listeners to find out if my VISU will shut...

  • pernockham posted a comment on discussion Runtime 🇬🇧

    Third update. I figured that even knowing the level of the license, it will not tell me if its level is enough for the current application. There must be some other way to find this out? I see a component CM write in the Log if starting without license-dongle. "License lost - time left.. " Can I access this CM to check status from inside the application? This function is essential, why is it so hard to find info about implementation?

  • pernockham modified a comment on discussion Runtime 🇬🇧

    I think google has fooled me here, the only thing I can conclude so far is what i now from reading the licenseManager, which tells me that my valid license have the following product-code CONTROL - 16#3000 VISU - 16#3003, feature map: 1000 COM - 16#3004, feature map: 0200 Will different level of license give different product codes or will I see the active license level by other means? What I am trying to achieve is block Starting a machine with time limited operation should the application be larger...

  • pernockham posted a comment on discussion Runtime 🇬🇧

    I think google has fooled me here, the only thing I can conclude so far is what i now from reading the licenseManager, which tells me that my valid license have the following product-code CONTROL - 16#3000 VISU - 16#3003, feature map: 1000 COM - 16#3004, feature map: 0200 Will different level of license give different product codes or will I see the active license level by other means? What I am trying to achieve is block Starting a machine with time limited operation should the application be larger...

  • pernockham modified a comment on discussion Runtime 🇬🇧

    Im trying to read out active license by CmpCodeMeter but am not sure of the combination of ProductCode and FeatureMap that each of CONTROL, VISU and COM / SMALL, MEDIUM, LARGE equals. Started by trying CodeMGetContentByFirmcode (and productCode) expecting error 18 / Not Available if asking for a higher level of license compared to what I know is active, but function just returned the requested productcode and a featuremap Is this the way or is it better to use CodeMOpen? Which seems to also require...

  • pernockham posted a comment on discussion Runtime 🇬🇧

    Im trying to read out active license by CmpCodeMeter but am not sure of the combination of ProductCode and FeatureMap that each of CONTROL, VISU and COM / SMALL, MEDIUM, LARGE equals. Started by trying CodeMGetContentByFirmcode expecting error 18 / Not Available if asking for a higher level of license compared to what I know is active, but function just returned the requested productcode and a featuremap Is this the way or is it better to use CodeMOpen? Which seems to also require a featureCode....

  • TimvH TimvH posted a comment on discussion Engineering 🇬🇧

    I don't work for IFM, nor for CODESYS and didn't create the .eds file or developed the CAN protocol. I have no knowledge of the exact contents and SDO's or PDO's which are exchanged. So no, I am not sure. But if the .eds file confirms to the CANopen specifications, why shouldn't it?

  • mankh posted a comment on discussion Engineering 🇬🇧

    Thanks,You sure there are not compatibility issues with the old IFM EDS files, PDO mapping, or startup SDO configuration in CODESYS 3.5?