Post by farren on Codesys complains about matching versions ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Success!! Thanks! -Farren
Last updated: 2025-12-16

Post by reinier-geers on Monitor active Codesys connection ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
HI, did you find the solution ?
Last updated: 2026-03-29

Post by vstrom on Codesys v3.5.22.10 - Fail to create a project Archive ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hello TimvH, thanks a lot! :)
Last updated: 2026-04-27

Post by totorovic on Ladder editor bug with 3.5.21.20 ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Can a Codesys member explain this ?
Last updated: 2026-05-20

Automation Server 🇬🇧 ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Discussion)}
The Industry 4.0 administration platform for users and operators of CODESYS compatible controllers
Last updated: 2026-06-16

Problem with missing content in Dialog Windows in Win11 ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
Problem with missing content in Dialog Windows in Win11
Last updated: 2026-01-14

Post by schelchpaul on Problem with missing content in Dialog Windows in Win11 ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Last updated: 2026-01-14

Problem with missing content in Dialog Windows in Win11 ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
Problem with missing content in Dialog Windows in Win11
Last updated: 2026-01-14

Conversion of analogue input into Real measurement value ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
Conversion of analogue input into Real measurement value
Last updated: 2026-01-26

Post by william on Unit testing support / libraries for EcoStruxure Machine Expert (CODESYS) ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Thank you, I will try it!
Last updated: 2026-02-20

Post by mjam04 on AM243 LaunchPad as PROFINET Device with CODESYS – RPC Aborted error when scanning devices ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Attachment
Last updated: 2026-03-13

Post by nicolasquintin on Codesys Installation Always Freeze when the installing is almost done ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Indeed that worked, thanks!
Last updated: 2026-04-05

Post by eschwellinger on V3.5 SP22 Patch1 ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
I would suggest to send the projectarchive to the CODESYS support.
Last updated: 2026-05-06

Post by eschwellinger on RaspberryPi 5 gateway problem ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Which CODESYS version and which runtime version do you use?
Last updated: 2026-05-22

Post by eschwellinger on too much data for the controller ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Retains used in the project?
Last updated: 2026-06-02

too much data for the controller ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
too much data for the controller
Last updated: 2026-06-02

Automating SCADA Reports with ATSCADA IExcelPouringTools ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Thread)}
Automating SCADA Reports with ATSCADA IExcelPouringTools
Last updated: 2026-06-13

Post by dmb-fan on Hilscher cards CoDeSys Control RTE ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Sounds good. Thx
Last updated: 2026-08-06

Post by oscardelmagno on Codesys v3.5.22.10 - Internal error:System.AggregateException...Value cannot be null...Parameter name: expLValue ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Last updated: 2026-08-25

Post by bschraud on runtime received SIGABRT ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Ich konnte den Fehler leider nicht wirklich finden. Hier mein bisheriger Fortschritt: Um nähere Informationen zu bekommen, habe ich einen strace erstellt: PID ermitteln: $ ps aux | grep codesyscontrol | grep -v grep --> 560 sudo strace -tt -f -p 560 -o /tmp/codesys_strace.log (Die Logdatei wird schnell einige hundert MB groß.) Mit grep -B 100 'si_signo=SIGABRT' /tmp/codesys_strace.log konnte ich die relevanten Einträge finden: (Die PID hat sich inzwischen wegen einem Reboot geändert) 1023 15:33:49.497136 writev(2, [{iov_base="Unexpected error 9 on netlink de"..., iov_len=45}], 1 <unfinished ...=""> .. 1023 15:33:49.498352 tgkill(545, 1023, SIGABRT <unfinished ...=""> 1023 15:33:49.498440 <... tgkill resumed> ) = 0 .. 1023 15:33:49.498730 --- SIGABRT {si_signo=SIGABRT, si_code=SI_TKILL, si_pid=545, si_uid=0}</unfinished></unfinished> Der Codesys Log zeigt zu diesem Zeitpunkt: Exception: HANDLED EXCPT <excpt>NonContinuable</excpt> in CH_COMM_CYCLE Mit sudo lsof -p 545 habe ich die Anzahl der geöffneten Dateien überprüft ohne Auffälligkeiten Mit sudo netstat -tunaep | grep codesys habe ich die offenen Netzwerkverbindungen der codesys Prozesse überprüft Hier sieht es so aus, dass codesyscontrol und codesysedge über die externen Netzwerkschnittstelle anstatt über den localhost kommunizieren: udp 0 0 172.19.11.127:1740 0.0.0.0: 0 17882 549/codesyscontrol. udp 0 0 172.19.11.255:1740 0.0.0.0: 0 17883 549/codesyscontrol. udp 0 0 172.19.11.255:1743 0.0.0.0: 0 16993 529/codesysedge.bin udp 0 0 172.19.11.127:1743 0.0.0.0: 0 16992 529/codesysedge.bin Leider kann ich keine Konfiguration mit einer anderen Schnittstelle einstellen.. Als nächstes habe ich die udp Kommunikation der beiden Prozesse aufgezeichnet: SPID des BlkDrvUdp Threads ermitteln: $ ps aux | grep codesyscontrol | grep -v grep --> 548 $ ps -T -p 548 | grep BlkDrvUdp --> 1200 Damit kann man den strace starten: sudo strace -p 1020 -f -tt -o /tmp/udp_control_trace.log -e trace=socket,connect,bind,sendto,recvfrom,close $ ps aux | grep codesysedge | grep -v grep --> 528 $ ps -T -p 528 | grep BlkDrvUdp --> 789 sudo strace -p 789 -f -tt -o /tmp/udp_edge_trace.log -e trace=socket,connect,bind,sendto,recvfrom,close Beim Aufzeichnen des Traces kamen wiederholte Fehlereinträge im codesyscontrol.log (diesmal ohne SIGABRT) nach folgendem Muster: tail -f /var/opt/codesys/codesyscontrol.log (mit UTC Zeit) 2025-04-17T11:23:43.147Z, 0x00000071, 1, 0, 0, Host : PAC4 2025-04-17T11:23:43.147Z, 0x00000071, 1, 0, 0, HTTP port : 8080 2025-04-17T11:23:43.147Z, 0x00000071, 1, 0, 0, HTTPS port : 443 2025-04-17T11:23:43.147Z, 0x00000071, 1, 0, 0, Connection type : HTTP 2025-04-17T11:23:43.147Z, 0x00000071, 1, 0, 0, ********** 2025-04-17T11:23:46.318Z, 0x00000061, 1, 0, 0, Create asymmetric key done! 2025-04-17T11:23:53.464Z, 0x00000071, 1, 404, 0, File $PlcLogic$/$visu$/favicon.ico not found on this server 2025-04-17T11:23:55.208Z, 0x0000100c, 1, 0, 0, Visu_PRG: Creating Client for Extern-ID: 2025487823 2025-04-17T11:23:55.216Z, 0x0000100c, 1, 0, 0, Visu_PRG: Creating Client successful for Extern-ID: 2025487823 Returned IEC-ID: 0 2025-04-17T11:40:43.471Z, 0x00000114, 4, 1, 0, ** ERROR: SysTaskCreate [CheckLicense0]: pthread_setname_np: Bad file descriptor Hier der dazu passende trace auszug von grep -B 100 '13:40:43' /tmp/udp_edge_trace.log: 798 13:40:42.592535 socket(AF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW|SOCK_CLOEXEC, NETLINK_ROUTE) = 9 798 13:40:42.592794 bind(9, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK, nl_pid=0, nl_groups=00000000}, 12) = 0 798 13:40:42.593049 sendto(9, {{len=20, type=0x12 / NLMSG_??? /, flags=NLM_F_REQUEST|0x300, seq=1744890042, pid=0}, "\x00\x00\x00\x00"}, 20, 0, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK, nl_pid=0, nl_groups=00000000}, 12) = 20 798 13:40:42.602995 sendto(9, {{len=20, type=0x16 / NLMSG_??? /, flags=NLM_F_REQUEST|0x300, seq=1744890043, pid=0}, "\x00\x00\x00\x00"}, 20, 0, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK, nl_pid=0, nl_groups=00000000}, 12) = 20 798 13:40:42.614794 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.615065 socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 9 798 13:40:42.615331 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.616159 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.616318 socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 9 798 13:40:42.616555 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.617209 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.617355 socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 9 798 13:40:42.617590 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.618497 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.618712 socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 9 798 13:40:42.618995 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.619568 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.620247 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.620441 socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 9 798 13:40:42.620690 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.621181 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:42.621823 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:43.520036 close(9) = 0 798 13:40:43.520406 close(9) = 0 und grep -B 100 '13:40:43' /tmp/udp_control_trace.log 1035 13:40:43.389785 socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 20 1035 13:40:43.390043 close(20) = 0 1035 13:40:43.390681 close(20) = 0 1035 13:40:43.393690 close(20) = 0 22586 13:40:43.450945 close(0) = 0 22586 13:40:43.451230 close(0) = -1 EBADF (Ungültiger Dateideskriptor) 22586 13:40:43.451689 close(20) = 0 22586 13:40:43.452104 close(1) = 0 22586 13:40:43.452481 close(21) = 0 22586 13:40:43.452679 close(2) = 0 22586 13:40:43.452860 close(2) = -1 EBADF (Ungültiger Dateideskriptor) 1009 13:40:43.454112 close(21) = 0 22586 13:40:43.454522 close(8) = 0 22586 13:40:43.455428 close(8) = 0 22586 13:40:43.455976 close(8) = 0 22586 13:40:43.456852 close(8) = 0 22587 13:40:43.463115 close(8) = 0 22587 13:40:43.464074 close(8) = 0 22587 13:40:43.464682 close(8) = 0 22587 13:40:43.465463 close(8) = 0 22587 13:40:43.468229 close(8) = 0 22587 13:40:43.468737 close(1 <unfinished ...=""> 1009 13:40:43.468805 close(20 <unfinished ...=""> 22587 13:40:43.468849 <... close resumed> ) = 0 1009 13:40:43.468896 <... close resumed> ) = 0 22587 13:40:43.468942 close(2) = 0 22587 13:40:43.469504 +++ exited with 0 +++ 22586 13:40:43.469670 --- SIGCHLD {si_signo=SIGCHLD, si_code=CLD_EXITED, si_pid=22587, si_uid=0, si_status=0, si_utime=0, si_stime=1} --- 22586 13:40:43.470175 +++ exited with 0 +++ 1009 13:40:43.470265 close(20) = 0 546 13:40:43.470577 --- SIGCHLD {si_signo=SIGCHLD, si_code=CLD_EXITED, si_pid=22586, si_uid=0, si_status=0, si_utime=0, si_stime=2} --- 1035 13:40:43.470913 close(20) = -1 EBADF (Ungültiger Dateideskriptor) 22588 13:40:43.480352 --- SIGRT_7 {si_signo=SIGRT_7, si_code=SI_TKILL, si_pid=546, si_uid=0} --- 22588 13:40:43.481675 --- SIGRT_6 {si_signo=SIGRT_6, si_code=SI_TKILL, si_pid=546, si_uid=0} --- 22588 13:40:43.482410 +++ exited with 0 +++</unfinished></unfinished> Die Zeile 2025-04-17T11:40:43.471Z, 0x00000114, 4, 1, 0, **** ERROR: SysTaskCreate [CheckLicense0]: pthread_setname_np: Bad file descriptor zeigt, dass der EBADF-Fehler beim Versuch auftritt, einen neuen Thread namens "CheckLicense0" zu erstellen. Die Funktion pthread_setname_np() erhält einen EBADF-Fehler. Ich weiß leider nicht, ob das eine heiße Spur ist. Parallel dazu habe ich die Aufrufe von Systemfunktionen über SysProcess_Implementation.SysProcessExecuteCommand2 auskommentiert ohne den Fehler damit abzustellen. An diesem Punkt habe ich wegen Termindruck den alten Stand der Runtime (4.11.0.0) mit der Codesys Version 3.5 SP20 wiederhergestellt und die geänderten Programme und Visualisierungen manuell getauscht mit dem Ergebnis, dass der Fehler in den letzten 2 Stunden nicht mehr aufgetreten ist. Wenn jemand das Problem kennt, wäre ich für einen Austausch dankbar. Frohe Ostern!
Last updated: 2025-04-17

Post by youness on No source code available (cip object) ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hi yotaro, hope your problem was resolved. I had the same, but with an other library title. This exception is not detected during compilation, but rather at a given position in the program (when switching to a given visualization). Although the exception is generated at this point, it does not involve the visualization in question. This error is due to one of 3 reasons: 1) A division by zero somewhere: The program is able to detect divisions by zero at compile time. But in the case of a variable, which takes a valid value at init and changes to 0 at a later stage. 2) An invalid pointer: (either because it has a value of 0, or because it points outside the memory reserved for the program) is being dereferenced. Locate any pointers or interfaces you have in the code and check them - you should also be wary of mixing inline modifications and pointers. 3) Array overflow: Generally when a processing operation is executed outside the array's definition range. Example: a write loop with n iterations is executed on an array of dimmension n-1. On the other hand, the error message may not appear. In the latter case, the error may have fatal consequences, as the overflow has induced writing to potentially forbidden memory areas. This problem can be explained by the fact that it's not always the adjacent memory areas of PLC_PRG that are overwritten, but the memory areas that are randomly allocated to the array during compilation. In this case, however, there is no entry in the log, so you need to integrate the "Implicit Check function", which checks the line of code generating the error. To integrate this functions, click on Application --> POU for implicit controls Regards,
Last updated: 2024-07-16

Post by mgabryel on Problems with CAN 2.0 comunication on Wago PLC (Codesys 3.5) ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hello, I am trying to program CAN Bus comunication on WAGO PLC (more precisely on WAGO Touch Monitor model TP600). I am using for this purpose library "WagoAppCanLayer2" from Wago company. My IDE for programming this device is CODESYS V3.5 SP19 Patch 2 + (64-bit). My program is written in Structured text using function blocks from previously mentioned library. Here is code of this program: 1) Variables declarations: PROGRAM PLC_PRG VAR oOpenInterface : WagoAppCanLayer2.FbCanL2Open :=( udiBaudrate := 125000 ); xInterfaceIsOpen : BOOL; sInterfaceInfo : STRING; oReceive : WagoAppCanLayer2.FbCanRx29BitFrame :=( xBufferMode := FALSE, wCanId := 16#181 ); xRecv : BOOL; sReceiveInfo : STRING; oSend : WagoAppCanLayer2.FbCanTx29BitFrame :=( dwCanId := 16#100, //was 16#201 xRtrFrame := FALSE ); xSend : BOOL; sSendInfo : STRING; oCanDiag : WagoAppCanLayer2.FbCanErrorInfo; xRst : BOOL; aSendData : ARRAY [1..8] OF BYTE; bSendLen : BYTE; TON_0 : TON; TON_1 : TON; END_VAR 2) Program body: oOpenInterface( xEnable := NOT xInterfaceIsOpen, I_Port := IoConfig_Globals.WAGO_CAN_LAYER2_DEVICE ); sInterfaceInfo := oOpenInterface.oStatus.GetDescription(); xInterfaceIsOpen S= oOpenInterface.xValid AND NOT oOpenInterface.xError; oReceive( xEnable := xInterfaceIsOpen, I_Port := IoConfig_Globals.WAGO_CAN_LAYER2_DEVICE, xRxTrigger := xRecv ); sReceiveInfo := oReceive.oStatus.GetDescription(); IF NOT xRecv THEN IF oReceive.bRxNBytes > 0 THEN oReceive.aRxBuffer[1]; oReceive.aRxBuffer[2]; oReceive.aRxBuffer[3]; oReceive.aRxBuffer[4]; oReceive.aRxBuffer[5]; oReceive.aRxBuffer[6]; oReceive.aRxBuffer[7]; oReceive.aRxBuffer[8]; END_IF xRecv := TRUE; END_IF aSendData[1] := 224; aSendData[2] := 13; aSendData[3] := 14; aSendData[4] := 15; aSendData[5] := 222; aSendData[6] := 13; aSendData[7] := 14; aSendData[8] := 15; bSendLen := 8; TON_0(IN:= NOT TON_1.Q, PT:= T#2S , Q=>xSend, ET=> ); TON_1(IN:= TON_0.Q, PT:= T#2S , Q=>, ET=> ); oSend( xEnable := xInterfaceIsOpen, I_Port := IoConfig_Globals.WAGO_CAN_LAYER2_DEVICE, aTxBuffer := aSendData, bTxNBytes := bSendLen, xTxTrigger := xSend ); sSendInfo := oSend.oStatus.GetDescription(); oCanDiag( xEnable := TRUE, I_Port := IoConfig_Globals.WAGO_CAN_LAYER2_DEVICE, xTriggerResetCounter := xRst, xValid=> , xError=> , oStatus=> , wBusState=> , wBusDiag=> , uiRxOverflowsL2=> , uiTxOverflowsL2=> , uiRxOverflows=> , uiMsgTimeouts=> , uiBusOffs=> , uiBusWarnings=> ); Program first opens comunication on CAN 2 device and then periodically try send one CAN data frame. After starting program CAN 2 interface is properly open. The xSend variable is toggling with period 2s. When program sends data an "Tx overflow" error appears. When I am watching CAN_H line on DSub 9 socket i am not able to see proper CAN frames - see screenshot attached to this message. Could somebody help me determine what is wrong with this program. Best regards
Last updated: 2024-08-02

Post by adamrobotic on llcallback() iec exception caught cmpid=0x00000002, eventid=0x00010008 ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hi All, Recently I have been experiencing a issue in CodeSys SP16 Patch 3, with a exception which comes up after I have made several online changes. callcallback() iec exception caught cmpid=0x00000002, eventid=0x00010008, after I experience this fault then I receive a error message for any subsequent online change "online change failed, no task gap within 10000ms". To recover either the controller needs a orgin reset, which will allow online edits thereafter until falling back into the loop. I am using a TURCK TX707 product which is controlling robot trajectory, We have hard coded the coordinate data rather than using persistence variables so hence the need to do online changes consistently. I have read on the forum other people have experienced similar issue with the online task gap, but I have no task which have same priority and also monitored the CPU usage and have not seen it go above 13%. Anyones help would be much appreciated, thankyou.
Last updated: 2023-08-18

Post by danwoodlock on RPI Zero w - Edge gateway cant install ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hello all, First post. I recently acquired an RPI zero W from amazon, and have been using it with Codesys v3.5 SP19 patch 2. I first got it working yesterday, and after installing the runtime on the Pi, I was prompted to install the edge gateway. Installation of the edge gateway failed because of unsupported architecture, undeterred I was able to connect to the pi and program as I wanted. The issue I've noticed is that if I do not load anything to the pi overnight, I can then no longer connect to the pi and download, although I can still ping it from my pc. I found that if I power cycle the PI, I am then able to connect again, and it works as normal. I did some googling and found instances where people recommended downloading the newest edge gateway, which brings me here. Wondering if there are any suggestions, or if this is a known issue. I actually tried installing all 3 versions of edge gateway for science, but all fail with the same message. Thanks -Dan
Last updated: 2023-09-13

Post by moksan on Unconnected_Send Explicit message with Route Path ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
I have been trying out Unconnected_Send Explicit Message with route path.(The Unconnected_Send service shall use the Connection Manager object in each router to forward the message and to remember the return path. Vol 1.3 / 3-5.6.7) However, I could not see the correct path on Wireshark. I want to see the Unconnected_Send Message Service Code as 0x52 and also the last of the message should have the route path. I want to ask some questions about this topic. The IIoDrvEIPAcylicServices Interface has the IoDrvSendUnconnectedMessage Method. And there is a struct (EIP_SendUnconnectedMessage) for this service. But there is no information about how to implement to project, and if it is successful, does it send a message with 0x52 Unconnected_Send Service Code or not? If that is not a solution, how can I set the Unconnected_Send Explicit Message struct on Codesys? Also how can I send explicit message with route path?
Last updated: 2023-10-17

Sort by relevance or date