Post by ranadheer on PHOENIX CONTACT Axioline PLCnext project in CodeSys SodftPLC ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Thank you Pernockham, I am using Windows SoftPLC and the device is CODESYS Control Win V3 x64. In the above attached example, the file is Linux-based. This is an external add-on file in the CODESYS installer (CODESYS Control for PLCnext SL). I am trying to implement it without this add-on file.
Last updated: 2025-09-09

Post by kio123 on SysFileOpen not working ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
I have exactly the same problem and tried entering “ForceIecFilePath=0” in the file “CODESYSControl.cfg” ([SysFile]). Unfortunately, this was unsuccessful. Can anyone help in the meantime, e.g., with some sample code or with the FAQ that TimvH refers to above (link no longer works)? Many thanks and best regards
Last updated: 2025-09-15

Post by imdatatas on The default ramp type selection in SoftMotion V4.18.0.0 is Quadratic ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Dear @gseidel, Thank you for your clarification. I fully agree that the quadratic ramp type may have certain technical advantages. However, the main problem is backward compatibility and consistency across projects. In many automation projects, application developers rely on the fact that creating a new axis object will behave exactly the same way as in previous versions. With SoftMotion V4.18.0.0 and later, if an application developer adds an axis and overlooks the changed default, the motion function blocks behave differently than expected. In particular, since the Jerk value in SM3_Basic function blocks is ineffective in trapezoid ramp type, users are accustomed to leaving this parameter empty in their projects. In many existing projects, this variable has not even been assigned. When the default is changed to quadratic, the Jerk parameter suddenly becomes relevant, which can cause errors or unexpected behaviour in the field. From a user perspective, a default setting should always be the “safe” and “expected” option, while alternative options (like quadratic) can be selected manually if desired. Keeping the default as trapezoid ensures compatibility with existing projects and prevents unexpected issues, while still allowing users to benefit from quadratic ramps if they explicitly choose so. For these reasons, I kindly ask you to reconsider making trapezoid the default again. This would significantly reduce the risk of unexpected behaviour in future projects while still preserving the advantages of the quadratic ramp type for those who actively select it. Of course, the final decision is entirely at your discretion. Best Regards, imdatatas
Last updated: 2025-09-26

Post by ulad on SPI Communication ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hello. I created a project that uses SPI. This project is working well. I can see with an oscilloscope that the SPI pins are actually changing. But when I resave this project in the IDE and open it later in the system, I see a constant error. What do I need to fix? What am I doing wrong? Thank you.
Last updated: 2023-12-23

Post by oscardm on Problem install codesys 3.5.17 SP 30 with Codesys Installer ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hi, I have a problem with codesys installer: if install a package on the codesys 3.5.17 SP17, and i try to install a package, for example SVN package, the codesys installer report the "digital signature expired error". Anyone have an idea for resolution ? Thanks for your feedback
Last updated: 2024-01-12

Post by hfelek on *SOURCEPOSITION* App = [Application] area=0, offset = 0 on default example ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hello, I am trying to run CmpTemplate component provided by Codesys for version 3.5.17. I call MyExternalFunction from the component but I get error as shown below. I see component is loaded successfully on runtime logs. I feel like I am missing something basically.
Last updated: 2024-01-15

Post by smartcoco on Add visual background FB blocks. ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Can you add a background FB block to the visualization page, and loop through this FB block when the page is in display mode. This FB block requires two more functions, one for executing when the page is displayed and the other for executing when the page is closed.
Last updated: 2024-01-16

Post by fcmtw on SDO generation ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hi, When I'm adding a CANOpen device in my WAGO CANOpen Manager, CODESYS automaticaly generates some SDO's that I can't directly disable. From what those SDO's are generated ? I'm not finding anything about it in the EDS files. Also, is there a way to disable the automaticaly generated SDO and execute the manualy created ones ? Regards, Florian
Last updated: 2024-01-23

Post by nano on Modbus TCP/IP slave communication errow ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
please tell us the exact error message from diagnostic. U can view it at devicetree in the node-element diagnostic from modbus-configuration. u also can activate the function auto-reconnect in master and increase a little bit the timeout and the repetition to male thw communication a little bit more robust
Last updated: 2024-02-04

Post by ronaldcom-pac on Gif in WebVisu ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
I am looking for some help with using Gifs in the WebVisu of codesys 3.5.18.40 as the model we tried with ladder logic does not animate the Gif and leaves as the first image of the Gif. Is there a way for ST or LL for it to be animated?
Last updated: 2024-02-08

Post by mondinmr on Direct Pointers in IOMapping for EtherCAT with IoDrvEthercatLib.ETCSlave_Dia ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Thank you for the response! It's a path I had already considered, however, while it has always worked for me on inputs, it doesn't on outputs, because if I enable the option to update all IOs at every scan, the IO tasks overwrite each other. However, I have found something very interesting which I am posting below.
Last updated: 2024-02-13

Post by dav3 on Exception auf Raspberry, CMCommCycleTask Tainted ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hello, I don't really know what my problem was, but it's working for me at the moment. All i did was to change my code because of some REAL_TO_INT conversions, like i wrote above. And later a complete new Pi setup (because of 64x support with 4.10.0.0 now).
Last updated: 2024-02-16

Post by reinier-geers on SysFileOpen does not work after update to V3.5 SP19 Patch 5 ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
At 19.1 the hFile_test should be RTS_IEC_HANDLE and always open-write - close in one cycle udi_handle: RTS_IEC_HANDLE; //handle-number. Is created by SysFileOpen udi_handle:=SysFileOpen(sFileName,Sysfile.AM_WRITE_PLUS, ADR(udi_ErrorCode)); udi_RetValWrite:=SysFileWrite(udi_handle, pRemBuffer, szRemBufSize, ADR(udi_ErrorCode)); //closing file IF udi_RetValWrite < szRemBufSize THEN ui_Error:=cWriteError; END_IF//error writing data udi_ErrorCode_Close:=SysFileClose(udi_handle);
Last updated: 2024-02-19

Post by alexgooi on Init Array input on a method ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Dear Forum, I would like to initialize an array input on a method. When I do this, I get the following error: "The type of ARRAY [1..2] OF BOOL cannot have a default value in this context." I attached a picture for more clarity. Is this simply not possible or is there a different way of tackling this problem? Thank you in advance
Last updated: 2024-02-26

Post by strannik on Estun servo with codesys ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hello dear colleagues. I have an ESTUN PRONET servo. I'm trying to control via softmotion over the CANopen bus. There is no Ethercat bus in this servo model. In another project,using Ethercat , I controlled four axes. I have problems with ESTUN PRONET servos. A DSP-402 driver mismatch is likely. I would be very grateful for your help in solving this problem.
Last updated: 2024-03-10

Post by dhumphries on Attempting customizing menus fails in LADDER environment; due to free CODESYS version ? ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
You get fewer tools when you create a new POU and choose ladder diagram instead of ladder logic diagram. Create a new POU and select ladder logic diagram and you should find the additional tools you are looking for in the toolbox.
Last updated: 2024-03-11

Post by manuknecht on High Cycle Times for SoftMotion_PlanningTask when using AxisGroup ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hi These issues occured using a Raspberry Pi 4. I also repeated the experiment with codesys control for Windows, which results in much lower cycle times. With up to 3 ms, I still think they are fairly high given they should run at 2 ms and don't require complicated kinematics. The effect of higher cycle times for slower movements also prevails.
Last updated: 2024-03-13

Post by mp9876 on Attempting customizing menus fails in LADDER environment; due to free CODESYS version ? ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
That definitely does the job with the Ladder Logic Diagram type; fully equipped toolbox. Just starting with Codesys and was following programming steps which explains the choice of ladder I had picked. Thanks for the tip and have a good one! Cheers!
Last updated: 2024-03-14

Post by manuknecht on High Cycle Times for SoftMotion_PlanningTask when using AxisGroup ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hi, we did install the real-time kernel patch on the RPI and also performed the additional optimizations including isolating the cores. Changing the configuration of the planning task e.g. running it on a separate core, changing the cycle times and mode from cyclic to freewheeling did not show any improvements.
Last updated: 2024-03-14

Post by k4zz on Static Code Analysis ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
I've already experimented with two methods, but unfortunately, they only function with projects of type *.project. Consequently, when executing: system.commands["staticanalysis", "run"].execute() For the 2nd Option: You'll need to ensure that in the Static Analysis Settings, the option "Perform static analysis automatically after compilation" is checked. # get Project values myProject = projects.primary # Creates an active application app = myProject.active_application # build Application and run static code analysis app.generate_code()
Last updated: 2024-03-15

Post by markushunter on Different behavior between the "Start" button in the IDE and the Cmp function "AppStartApplication()" ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
One workaround is to create a second application which is started after the rested of the main application. The second application starts the main application after time x and is rest after done start of the main application. No problems during the fieldbus re-start by this workaround.
Last updated: 2024-03-22

Post by nano on Error building Extension SDK Linux code ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hey schnepper, when i look into your c-file, i would say that only the main-function is declared with cext-addendum in your codesys-library-project. all yöur funtions in library has to be the cext-addendum when the external implementation is activ. if i remeber right, methods and other subelements dont need that, but every base-elements
Last updated: 2024-04-02

Post by fabmorlino on Codesys v3.5 SP11 and Python scripts ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hi, I'm using codesys from a while, but I 'm not able to write phyton scripts. I whould like generate a PC txt file with the content of specific GVL codesys table, or better for my scope: a txt file from a STRUCT defined in CODESYS project. Any kind man could help me with some clue? Thanks Fabrizio
Last updated: 2024-04-05

Post by hanoues on Holding brake release ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
I've tried using the SMC3_BrakeControl function block to control the brake, but unfortunately, it's not functioning as expected. Despite setting the appropriate parameters and inputs, the brake control does not operate correctly. Any insights or suggestions on resolving this issue would be greatly appreciated. STATE_MANUAL.UNLOCK_BRAKE: IF Button_release_brake THEN GVL.drum1_Control_Brake:=TRUE; FBA.T11_ContBrake.bExecute := TRUE; GVL.manual_state := STATE_MANUAL.WAIT_FOR_BRAKE_RELEASE; END_IF STATE_MANUAL.WAIT_FOR_BRAKE_RELEASE: IF FBA.T11_ContBrake.bDone THEN FBA.T11_ContBrake.bExecute := FALSE; GVL.manual_state := STATE_MANUAL.WAIT_START_BUTTON; END_IF
Last updated: 2024-04-08

Post by idir93dz on Identifier 'IoDrvGPIO' not defined ^{CODESYS Forge talk (Post)}
Hello, After installing the pi runtime and creating a pi project, I get these errors: [ERROR] Untitled3: Application [Device: PLC Logic]: C0046: Identifier 'IoDrvGPIO' not defined [ERROR] Untitled3: Application [Device: PLC Logic]: C0080: Function block 'IoDrvGPIO' must be instantiated to be accessed [ERROR] Untitled3: Application [Device: PLC Logic]: C0004: 'IoDrvGPIO' is no component of 'IoDrvGPIO'
Last updated: 2024-04-10

Sort by relevance or date