Activity for alrcastro

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    I'm no longer working with this PLC brand, but if I were you, I would try to stop all related Codesys services before the copy and restart them after that.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    In addition to the above tip, your program is overlooking error codes for formatting and file access functions; it is always good practice to read these parameters.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    After leaving this question for a while, I made a further research and found the answer on the Codesys website itself, unfortunately not here in this community. For those with similar issue, just to share: https://www.codesys.com/news-events/press-releases/article/3s-smart-software-solutions-gmbh-becomes-codesys-gmbh.html

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Until some time ago, whenever we installed the PLC runtime in Windows, the following appeared in the container: 3S-Smart Software Solutions Softlicenses But now it's showing... CODESYS GmbH Softlicenses So far, this would not represent any problem, but our solution programmatically checks the existence of this license and displays it in the Webvisu. Has anyone else gone through this ?

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Until some time ago, whenever we installed the PLC runtime in Windows, the following appeared in the container: 3S-Smart Software Solutions Softlicenses But now it's showing... CODESYS GmbH Softlicenses So far, this would not represent any problem, but our solution programmatically checks the existence of this license and displays it in the Webvisu. Has anyone else gone through this ?

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Depending on the task configuration it won't work this way. I mean, the project I worked with, the time slice was 2ms for the fastest task, and the Wifi latency can easily reach and surpass this time. In other hand, if you are running a lightweight task for a bare interlock application, you can configure the task time slice for a mild value.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Indeed, the license is binded not only to the hardware, but also to the OS itself, as for example, you cannot change the ETH port name nor the Host name itself, which is a problem if you need to update your system in order to comply with changes on your project.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Thanks for your support, we'll try as you recommnded. BTW, Task1 is just for low speed procedures, not critical timmming constraints, whereas Task0 is for 'realtime' jobs.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Thanks for your support, we'll try as you recommnded. BTW, Task1 os just for low speed procedures, not critical timmming constraints, whereas Task0 is for 'realtime' jobs.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Thanks for your support, we'll try as you recommnded.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi @eschwellinger, After a short wait, we were able to capture a crash event, apparently occurring at 2022-05-23T07:38; our application automatically STOP/START the Codesys runtime in case of connection loss - which is the systemically tangible symptom of the problem; electrically, all outputs are cleared. And, again, log entries are not inteligible for us, could you have a see on that ?

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi @eschwellinger, We had to wait a time to face to another lock issue with the runtime at which the logger procedure were applied, and just today at 19/05/2022 02:29:15 (GMT-3) it happened again. However from the log files, at first sight, we could not find any entry that could give any tip; could you see that please? Kind regards, Andre.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi @eschwellinger, We had to wait a time to face to another lock with the runtime at which the logger procedure were applied, and just today at 19/05/2022 02:29:15 (GMT-3) it happened again. However from the log files, at first sight, we could not find any entry that could give any tip; could you see that please? Kind regards, Andre.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    We have a problem in the runtime of a PLC that frequently crashes for no apparent reason, both the PLC outputs and Webvisu do not respond. The only anomaly that we observed in the Codemeter diagnostics are the recurring messages below. Anyone have a guess? 2022-05-13 14:56:44: Handle 668 released 2022-05-13 14:56:44: Access from local(IPV4) to FC:PC=5000304:305021 with Exclusive Mode (Handle 670) 2022-05-13 14:57:44: Entry (101597:305021) not found - Event WB0200 (ENTRY NOT FOUND), Request IP-Address...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Many thanks again for your kind help.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    The above link redirects to this thread, is it the intent ? I can't see here where is the answer to the question posed before: I could find an occurrence of a coredump word at the file Application.core file as an <cmp>CmpCoreDump</cmp> entry, but I'm unable to understand what this mean.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    The above link redirects to this thread, is it the intent ? I can't see here where is the answer to the question posed before: I could find an occurrence of a **coredump** word at the file *Application.core* file as an **<cmp>CmpCoreDump</cmp>** entry, but I'm unable to understand what this mean.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, Could you give some feedback on this ? I found the word 'coredump' as you told, but don't know the meaning. Seems like the addition of the MS Loopback connector did not change much. BR,

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, Could you give some feedback on this ? I found the word 'coredump' as you told, but don't know the meaning. Seems like the addition of the MS Loopback connector did not change much. BR,

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, Could you give some feedback on this ? I found the word 'coredump' as you told, but don't know the meaning. BR,

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    You didn't exactly mention which RASP variant you are using, but from RPI3 onwards UART0 is exclusive to the Bluetooth and UART1 is general purpose, so you could not use UART0 as you want. Note that UART0 is an implementation based on the INTEL 16550 chipset whereas UART1 is a simplified version, implemented almost in softcore, but still works well.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    You didn't exactly mention which RASP variant you are using, but from RPI3 onwards UART0 is exclusive to the Bluetooth and UART1 is general purpose. Note that UART0 is an implementation based on the INTEL 16550 chipset whereas UART1 is a simplified version, implemented almost in softcore, but still works well.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, Thank you for your patience. As per the above points: I could find an occurrence of a coredump at the file Application.core file as an <cmp>CmpCoreDump</cmp> entry, but I'm unable to understand what this mean. Unfortunatelly there is no timestamp close to this text so that I could determine any relation with the stuck issue. In fact, I cannot check the system resources in realtime, just the average at a glance from time to time, and now that we added another SSD card, MEM lies in the range...

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, in accordance with your tips, the MS Loopback connector was installed, as can be seen attached; however, after a couple of hours, I'd noticed the PLC getting innactive at the output, and no TCP connection to the Webvisu 127.0.0.1:8080, so once again the program got stuck. By checking the CODESYS Control Win V3 - x64.log content, I could notice the same pattern, the following sentence even with the loopback connector there: *CODESYS Control Service: Warning: DEMO mode activated, terminating...

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, in accordance with your tips, the MS Loopback connector was installed, as can be seen attached; however, after a couple of hours, I'd noticed the PLC getting innactive at the output, and no TCP connection to the Webvisu 127.0.0.1:8080, so once again the program got stuck. By checking the CODESYS Control Win V3 - x64.log content, I could notice the same pattern, the following sentence even with the loopback connector there: code Am I missing something ? 11/23/21 09:52:31: --------------------------------------------------------------------------...

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, in accordance with your tips, the MS Loopback connector was installed, as can be seen attached; however, after a couple of hours, I'd noticed the PLC getting innactive at the output, and no TCP connection to the Webvisu 127.0.0.1:8080, so once again the program got stuck. By checking the CODESYS Control Win V3 - x64.log content, I could notice the same pattern, the following sentence even with the loopback connector there: CODESYS Control Service: Warning: DEMO mode activated, terminating...

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, in accordance with your tips, the MS Loopback connector was installed, as can be seen attached; however, after a couple of hours, I'd noticed the PLC getting innactive at the output, and no TCP connection to the Webvisu 127.0.0.1:8080, so once again the program got stuck. By checking the CODESYS Control Win V3 - x64.log content, I could notice the same pattern, the following sentence even with the loopback connector there: CODESYS Control Service: Warning: DEMO mode activated, terminating...

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, in accordance with your tips, the MS Loopback connector was installed, as can be seen attached; however, after a couple of hours, I'd noticed the PLC getting innactive at the output, and no TCP connection to the Webvisu 127.0.0.1:8080, so once again the program got stuck. By checking the CODESYS Control Win V3 - x64.log content, I could notice the same pattern, the sentence CODESYS Control Service: Warning: DEMO mode activated, terminating in approx. 120 minutes. even with the loopback...

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, in accordance with your tips, the MS Loopback connector was installed, as can be seen attached; however, after a couple of hours, I'd noticed the PLC getting innactive at the output, and no TCP connection to the Webvisu 127.0.0.1:8080, so once again the program got stuck. By checking the CODESYS Control Win V3 - x64.log content, I could notice the same pattern, the sentence CODESYS Control Service: Warning: DEMO mode activated, terminating in approx. 120 minutes. even with the loopback...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, in accordance with your tips, the MS Loopback connector was installed, as can be seen attached; however, after a couple of hours, I'd noticed the PLC getting innactive at the output, and no TCP connection to the Webvisu 127.0.0.1:8080, so once again the program got stuck. By checking the CODESYS Control Win V3 - x64.log content, I could notice the same pattern, some lines with the sentence CODESYS Control Service: Warning: DEMO mode activated, terminating in approx. 120 minutes. even with...

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Interesting, never heard about that loopback. [Added] I've just installed, and I presume I need to define [IP Address] as 127.0.0.1 (I did it) but what about [gateway] and [mask] ? Thanks a lot.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Interesting, never heard about that loopback. [Added] I've just installed, and I presume I need to define <ip address=""> as 127.0.0.1 (I did it) but what about <gateway> and <mask> ?</mask></gateway></ip> Thanks a lot.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Interesting, never heard about that loopback. [Added] I've just installed, and I presume I need to define 127.0.0.1 as its IP address (I did it). No additional step required, right ? Thanks a lot.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Interesting, never heard about that loopback. [Added] I've just installed, and I presume I need to define 127.0.0.1 as its IP address (I did it) ? No additional step required, right ? Thanks a lot.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Interesting, never heard about that loopback. I'll make a search on that. Thanks a lot.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, These are either the LOG and CSV files. Seems like there is an issue with the licence acknowledgement, although we DO have all PC's properly licenced. What to do ? LOG 11/23/21 09:52:31: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11/23/21 09:52:31: CODESYS Control Win V3 - x64 Service started 11/23/21 09:52:31: Config file: 11/23/21 09:52:31: C:\ProgramData\CODESYS\CODESYSControlWinV3x64\E76864C4\CODESYSControl.cfg 11/23/21 09:53:28: CODESYS Control Win V3...

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, These are either the LOG and CSV files. Seems like there is an issue with the licence acknowledgement, although we DO have all PC's properly licenced. What to do ? LOG 11/23/21 09:52:31: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11/23/21 09:52:31: CODESYS Control Win V3 - x64 Service started 11/23/21 09:52:31: Config file: 11/23/21 09:52:31: C:\ProgramData\CODESYS\CODESYSControlWinV3x64\E76864C4\CODESYSControl.cfg 11/23/21 09:53:28: CODESYS Control Win V3...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, I fear that the root cause might be rather related to the Licencing schema. A time ago we got a committed assistance from Codesys support for over a week, which even forwarding the issue straight to Wibu-Systems, they could not assertively state the actual cause. As posed at the above case, either the LOG and the DEBUG messages give indication of missing licence, although licence was properly activated there. BR, Andre

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, I also thought alike, whenever RAM usage hold high, more frequent the incidence of PLC-getting-stuck. However, these days we had added another DDR memory card into PC mainboard, so that now it lies in the range of ~47% usage (16G) whereas before it was in the range of 80%-90% of 8G, but even after this hardware 'upgrade' in less than 24hs it was 2 occurrences. Regarding Webvisu, it also face to the same issue, regardless of the browser we use (sometimes not even open). In order to check...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, I also thought alike, whenever RAM usage hold high, more frequent the incidence of PLC-getting-stuck. However, these days we had added another DDR memory card into PC mainboard, so that now it lies in the range of ~47% usage (16G) whereas before it was in the range of 80%-90% of 8G. In less than 24hs it was 2 occurrences. Regarding Webvisu, it also face to the same issue, regardless of the browser we use (sometimes not even open). In order to check if it is up, I use the Realterm tool to...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Have you selected the serial adaptor at the device object ? I mean, by right-clicking the above MODBUS_COM instance you get into its properties panel, so that can choose what port to use. Note that depending on which physical USB entry you plug it, there will be distinct inner properties.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    I'd attached the whole CSV file. Just changed the HOST name and IP, for security sake. Att.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    I'd attached the full SCV file. Just changed the HOST name and IP, for security sake. Att.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, These are either the LOG and CSV files. Seems like there is an issue with the licence acknowledgement, although we DO have all PC's properly licenced. What to do ? LOG 11/23/21 09:52:31: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11/23/21 09:52:31: CODESYS Control Win V3 - x64 Service started 11/23/21 09:52:31: Config file: 11/23/21 09:52:31: C:\ProgramData\CODESYS\CODESYSControlWinV3x64\E76864C4\CODESYSControl.cfg 11/23/21 09:53:28: CODESYS Control Win V3...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    a real one, Windows 10, i5, DELL optiplex 7070

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi Edwin, These are either the LOG and CSV files. Seems like there is an issue with the licence, although we DO have. What to do ? LOG 11/23/21 09:52:31: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11/23/21 09:52:31: CODESYS Control Win V3 - x64 Service started 11/23/21 09:52:31: Config file: 11/23/21 09:52:31: C:\ProgramData\CODESYS\CODESYSControlWinV3x64\E76864C4\CODESYSControl.cfg 11/23/21 09:53:28: CODESYS Control Win V3 - x64 Service stopped 11/23/21 09:53:33:...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi, We have the Codesys Control Win 64 runtime installed on several PC's which for a long time has berhaved pretty stable, especially considering that the system resources are shared with several other applications, which on the whole eat up the following resources, in extreme cases. CPU / 3.4GHz (40-60%) RAM / 8GB (80%-90%) As we do not monitor these values in real time, we do not know if there are peaks beyond the above averages. However, recently we have noticed the PLC runtime crashing, maybe...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    As far as I know, Codesys' licensing procedure is in essence a strongly blockchain process since the activation is made in several upload/download steps, so just copying the licence folder from the previous installation might not be enough, but I could be wrong.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    The above general Linux Codesys SL licence costs 199 Euros whereas the specific one for Linux RPI is only 50 Euros, sadly. In this case it would be cheapest to consider plugging an USB/ETH device, despite the inconvenience of having one more stuff hanging on the board. Anyway, just to be up to date with the Codesys trends, do you know if it is planned to expand the Codesys support into the Raspberry portfolio ?

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    We're particularly interested on the fact that this SBC has 2 Ethernet adaptors. One would be dedicated to the EtherCAT bus and another one to the external communication: http://www.orangepi.org/Orange%20Pi%20R1%20Plus/

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    We're particularly interested on the fact that this SBC has 2 Ethernet adaptors. Since one would be dedicated to the EtherCAT bus and another one to the external communication: http://www.orangepi.org/Orange%20Pi%20R1%20Plus/

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Thank you again for your ever kind help.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    An issue we just came accross is that, according to what we've found, sounds like the Edge Gateway do not performs a straight connection P2P between our Engineering tool and the gateway itself, but rather a cloud-based access trhought the CODESYS Automation Server; the End application on the factory side have restrictions regarding third parties connections.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi, I quite appreciate your help, it is seemingly exactly what we need. However I could not find any concise tutorial explainig the whole step-by-step, but only split videos covering specific issues. Could I ask you for a link explainig how to do that ?

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi, I quite appreciate your help, it is seemingly exactly what we need. However I could not find any concise tutorial explainig the whole step-by-step, but only split videos covering specific issues. Could I ask you for a link explainig how to do that ? Anyway, an issue we just came accross is that, according to what we've found, sounds like the Edge Gateway do not performs a straight connection P2P between our Engineering tool and the gateway itself, but rather a cloud-based access trhought the...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi, I quite appreciate your help, it is seemingly exactly what we need. However I could not find any concise tutorial explainig the whole step-by-step, but only split videos covering specific issues. Could I ask you for a link explainig how to do that ? Many thanks in advance.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Not bumping the thread, just adding an overview of the issue. The original topology: [ PC(WIN10) : Codesys runtime ] <=> Engineering Tool The wanted topology: [ RPI3(Linux) : Codesys runtime ] <=> [ PC(WIN10) : Portfowarding(?) ] <=> Engineering Tool

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi there, We have been using last years the Codesys in WIN10, having the PC as the interface for the H/W of the PLC I/O's, so far so good. In this case, the PC is installed remotely, and its IP is normally routed through the wired network (eg. 10.20.30.40 ). However, we are carrying out tests with the I/O's of the PLC in another architecture, now embedded in an SBC (RPI3), and its IP is distinct from the external network, as it is located in another network adapter (USB/ETH) in the internal network...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    Hi there, We are facing to an issue that is affecting part of the PC's at which we have the "CODESYS Control Win V3 - x64" service properly licenced. Actually, from more than 15 computers, something about 3 ones stop running after a time, sometimes something about 15min or even more than 6 hours uninterrupted. The strangest symptom is that the Systray icon appear as (running), but only after I click on 'STOP PLC' and 'START PLC' the runtime get restored back to work. The "CODESYS Control Win V3 -...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

    There are manufacturers specific Ethernet/EtherCAT adaptors, as for example the EK1100 from Beckhoff, which and at least with me worked fine. However you should be aware that since Raspberry PI has just 1 Ehternet port, you need an additional Ethernet port in order to have your PI-PLC connected with the LAN, and an USB/ETH adaptor did the job for me.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering

    Hi Edwin, it's exactly the list I wanted...thanks. the easy approach is for sure this: I appreciate your attempt, but I prefer to perform the control myself. (-:

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    Hi @aliazzz, I fear it doesn't apply to this case in particular, since the system architecture is defined as follows: local PC (Codesys Engineering) <==> WEB <==> ROUTER <==> remote PC (Codesys runtime) <==> PLC Note that, from the PC target view, either communication with PLC and ROUTER happens at distinct physical networks, I mean, at different Ethernet cables, therefore it shouldn't matter, isn't it ? Thks

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering

    Hi @aliazzz, I fear it doesn't apply to this case in particular, since the system architecture is defined as follows: local PC (Codesys Engineering) <==> WEB <==> ROUTER <==> remote PC (Codesys runtime) <==> PLC Note that, from the PC target view, either communication with PLC and ROUTER happens at distinct physical networks, I mean, at different Ethernet cables, therefore it shouldn't matter, isn't it ? Thks

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    We are enhancing the connectivity policies of controllers in field running Codesys runtime. Is there any general guideline showing what are the ports that should be added to the whitelist ? The main concern is keeping the ability to connect them in order to remote debug with the "login" feature on which we can see variable contents online.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering

    We are enhancing the connectivity policies of controllers in field running Codesys runtime. Is there any general guideline showing what are the ports that should be added to the whitelist ?

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime

    I need to perform upload of runtime applications at Device controllers, made from notebooks which has no Codesys engineering IDE. Search engines don't give any link about that on the online tutorial, unless I'm missing something trivial. So, how it can be done ?

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Runtime

    After a careful search on the following tutorial, I could not find this option anywhere: https://help.codesys.com/api-content/2/codesys/3.5.15.0/en/_cds_installing_license/#licensing-products Am I missing something ?

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime

    After a careful search on the following tutorial, I could not find this option anywhere: https://help.codesys.com/api-content/2/codesys/3.5.13.0/en/_cds_installing_license/#licensing-products Am I missing something ?

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime

    Have a look at the SchedGetProcessorLoad at the library.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Runtime

    Is there a variable to read the runtime health, Running or Stopped You can check whether the whole service is running or stopped by checking the service status (the status that you see at Windows Taskmanager). It is possible to do e.g with a CMD command line taking this and then writing to an user defined environment variable. I'm home-office, so cannot give you any sample script right now.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering

    Just to give a feedback on this: By doing a re-install worked fine, a new (empty) container appeared at 'CodeMeter' viewer and the "License Manager" recognized it, being able to install there one license there; after all, 'CodeMeter' show up a valid license stored at this container. Thanks

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    So....why doesn't it suffice ? Please note that I'm asking this because whenever install Codesys runtime into a fresh system, by default it is created an empty container...

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    ....why doesn't it suffice ? Please note that I'm asking this because whenever install Codesys runtime into a fresh system, by default it is created an empty container...

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    Why doesn't it suffice ? Please note that I'm asking this because whenever install Codesys runtime into a fresh system, by default it is created an empty container...

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    reinstall CODESYS will not solve to add a new empty softcontainer. Sorry for insisting on this point, but I wanted understand exactly how things works on Codesys. I always prefer solutions by friendly interfaces, not manually... After complete removal of 'wrong' container with steps you told above, and by re-install ControlWin, I got the following status, which give indication that possibly was added an empty folder :

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    Why doesn't it suffice ?

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    reinstall CODESYS will not solve to add a new empty softcontainer. Sorry for insisting on this point, but I wanted understand exactly how things works on Codesys. I always prefer solutions by friendly interfaces, not manually... After complete removal of 'wrong' container, and by re-install ControlWin, I got the following status, which give indication that possibly was added an empty folder :

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering

    Why doesn't if suffice ?

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    reinstall CODESYS will not solve to add a new empty softcontainer. Sorry for insisting on this point, but I wanted understand exactly how things works on Codesys. I always prefer solutions by friendly interfaces, not manually... After complete removal of 'wrong' container, and by re-install, I got the following status, which give indication that possibly was added an empty folder :

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering

    Sorry for insisting on this point, but I wanted understand exactly how things works on Codesys. I always prefer solutions by friendly interfaces, not manually... After complete removal of 'wrong' container, and by re-install, I got the following status, which give indication that possibly was added an empty folder :

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    on your CODESYS developmentsystem as already mentioned: c:\Program Files\CODESYS 3.5.15.40\Temp\3S-SmartSoftwareSolutionsSoftlicenses.c Ok, just to certify if I understood correctly : Can I simply copy the above .wbb file from developmentsystem computer and just paste it to the controller's computer ??? Alternately, just to make things simplest: After succesfull removal of the invalid container, would suffice re-install "CODESYS Control Win 64 3.5.15.30.exe" on the Controler's side (since it is the...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering

    on your CODESYS developmentsystem as already mentioned: c:\Program Files\CODESYS 3.5.15.40\Temp\3S-SmartSoftwareSolutionsSoftlicenses.c Ok, just to certify if I understood correctly : Can I simply copy the above .wbb file from developmentsystem computer and just paste it to the controller's computer ??? Alternately, just to make things simplest: After succesfull removal of the invalid container, would suffice re-install "CODESYS Control Win 64 3.5.15.30.exe" on the Controler's side (since it is the...

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    Hi Edwin, It is nice to hear that this licence in particular was not lost at all, we've purchased the exact amount for the current need. And, I'm happy to know that there will be added the required steps on the online help. In the meantime, could you please tell me from where I need to pick the file above mentioned ? "3S-SmartSoftwareSolutionsSoftlicenses.wbb" My 2 cents: I have been trying to follow steps on the online help regarding distinct procedures, and many suffice for our needs, but some...

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    Hi Edwin, It is nice to hear that this licence in particular was not lost at all, we've purchased the exact amount for the current need. And, I'm happy to know that there will be added the required steps on the online help. In the meantime, could you please tell me from where I need to pick the "3S-SmartSoftwareSolutionsSoftlicenses.wbb" file above mentioned ? My 2 cents: I have been trying to follow steps on the online help regarding distinct procedures, and many suffice for our needs, but some...

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    Hi Edwin, It is nice to hear that this licence in particular was not lost at all, we've purchased the exact amount for the current need. And, I'm happy to know that there will be added the required steps on the online help. In the meantime, could you please tell me from where I need to pick the "Temp3S-SmartSoftwareSolutionsSoftlicenses.wbb" file above mentioned ? My 2 cents: I have been trying to follow steps on the online help regarding distinct procedures, and many suffice for our needs, but some...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering

    Hi Edwin, It is nice to hear that this licence in particular was not lost at all, we've purchased the exact amount for the current need. And, I'm happy to know that there will be added the required steps on the online help. In the meantime, could you please tell me from where I need to pick the "Temp3S-SmartSoftwareSolutionsSoftlicenses.wbb" file above mentioned ? My 2 cents: I have been trying to follow steps on the online help regarding distinct procedures, and many suffice for our needs, but some...

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    We just purchased a lot of licenses, and I got stuck with the first step. Since it is the first install I did, I may have done some mistake. The issue is that, all Controller's computer's came from the the same disk image, cloned from a reference PC, and I forgot to remove the existing container, and now it appears as being 2 runtime activated at the same computer. How can I uninstall the 2nd license, without firing it ? I mean, I wanted to remove the assignment on Codesys store of the ticket that...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering

    ...yet another question: How to remove an existing container from PC ? Once each license will be installed at PC's whose whole system were cloned from a unique template CloneZilla's file, there we can see a container which I presume should be deleted before installing/activating the just purchased license - a step that I didn't at the above mentioned case.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering

    We just purchased a lot of licenses (let's say "n" tickets - private information), and I got stuck with the first step. Since it is the first install I did, I may have done some mistake. The issue is that, all Controller's computer's came from the the same disk image, cloned from a reference PC, and I forgot to remove the existing container, and now it appears as being 2 runtime activated at the same computer. How can I unnistal the 2nd license, without firing it ? I mean, I wanted to remove the...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Visualization

    @Marcel, I wanted that the images were not static, but rarther updated dynamically, either upon request or automatically by the browser itself through the already existing resource "reload image when file changes". @kislov, I made a careful analysis of the Log which didn't recorded any mention of handling the image, whether tagged as Info, Warn or Error. I also tried to upload the updated images directly to the folder where Visu images are stored, and also did not work. BT, the jpeg image I am using...

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Visualization

    I added a picture to the ImagePool having the attribute "Embeeded and LinktoFile" and I added the picture to the VISU area the same way as I did ith a static image (which works fine). However, the linked picture don't even appear right after the runtime get started. The picture is on the same folder and has the same name, either at the Controller's side, as well at the Codesys IDE side. None of them has space nor special characters. Is there any tutorial on this regard?

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    Forget about creating a PATH enviroment variable, something that is available in many other programs, not Codesys. To be honest, I give up on this request.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    Forget about creating a PATH enviroment variable, something that is available in many other programs, not Codesys. To be honest, forget about all this, I give up on this request.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    Forget about creating a PATH enviroment variable, I give up on this request.

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering

    Forget about creating an enviroment variable, I give up on this request.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    Perfect, it's exactly what I wanted. Just to help others, here the keywords to search: "Device-Tree-in-Online-Mode"

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    Perfect, it's exactly what I wanted. Just to help others, here the keywords to search: "Device-Tree-in-Online-Mode"

  • alrcastro alrcastro posted a comment on discussion Engineering

    Regarding the PATH request in the environment variable for each installed runtime, I absolutely cannot understand the issue of implementing this, since the installation is made by a standard installer application, which when generating the directory could create an entry for each one.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    this is a typcial task for the CODESYS Automation server Ok, it could solve the issue for while, but it will not remain free. Since is is expected a big amount of deploys during the end 2020 and start of 2021, I just wanted to deal with the affordable solution. I'm sure it is quite easy to implement on the development team side. Please consider forwarding this request.

  • alrcastro alrcastro modified a comment on discussion Engineering

    this is a typcial task for the CODESYS Automation server Ok, it could solve the issue for while, but it will not remain free. Since is is expected a big amount of deploys during the end 2020 and start of 2021, I just wanted to deal with the affordable solution.

1 >